This website uses marketing and tracking technologies. Opting out of this will opt you out of all cookies, except for those needed to run the website. Note that some products may not work as well without tracking cookies.
Opt Out of CookiesThis website uses marketing and tracking technologies. Opting out of this will opt you out of all cookies, except for those needed to run the website. Note that some products may not work as well without tracking cookies.
Opt Out of Cookies
By Olivia Pierson First published on The Goodoil New Zealand’s history is messy, fascinating, and occasionally absurd. The Maori weren’t exactly sitting around in a utopia when the Europeans turned up. They were busy having a go at each other in tribal warfare and, yes, usually eating the losers. The British didn’t arrive with halos over their heads either, but they did bring literacy, a legal system and building standards for a life above the dirt. They also brought an uncanny knack for signing treaties which actually meant something substantial when they were signed. The representatives of Queen Victoria would never have signed a treaty in her name without guaranteeing her full sovereignty over that colony. To say otherwise is part of the 'occasionally absurd’ bit. History is full of uncomfortable truths, and we need to face them without indulging in the fashionable guilt or grievance narratives that dominate today’s hysterical reactions. And I mean hysterical. Maori were a tribal warrior society. They had their own cultural norms, some of which— like cannibalism — were undeniably primitive in the extreme. But the Europeans didn’t come to destroy Maori; they came to build a civilisation along with the Christian ethic of treating others as equals before God, that was the goal. Thank God it was the British and not the French or Portuguese who did the colonising. British missionaries, in particular, out of genuine affection, preserved the Maori language and even tried to mediate conflicts between tribes hell-bent on bloodlust, like Te Rauparaha's, no doubt screaming their “Ka Mate” haka while carving a bloody gash across the Waikato leaving nothing but misery and slaughter in their wake. Far from eradicating Maori culture, many of the British were instrumental in safeguarding its survival. They recorded their language, they intermarried and mingled their bloodlines together and above all they formed valuable and much desired friendships. The British and Maori became kinsmen. Yet, what do we see today? A toxic culture of division being perpetuated by activists who are only interested in ginning-up resentment. Instead of celebrating the benefits of a shared heritage — one that includes Western advancements that raised the standard of living for everyone — these agitators push for separatism. Co-governance, race-based laws, and constant demands for ‘decolonisation’ are going to rip our social fabric apart. Here’s the truth: no nation can survive on the basis of two separate legal systems, one for one race and one for another. That is not equality, it’s apartheid, plain and simple. And what makes it worse is that this divisive ideology is being peddled under the guise of liberal ‘justice.’ It’s not liberal it’s just woke and it’s not justice, it’s Maori supremacy, brought to you by the United Nations. We need to reject this path and embrace the only principles that made New Zealand a success: equality before the law, individual rights, and a shared national identity. We should respect Maori heritage, but respect isn’t achieved by bending the knee to historical grievances or rewriting the rules of governance to privilege one group over many others. Maori culture, like Western culture, is worth preserving — and not through racial favouritism or endless guilt-tripping about colonisation. It’s preserved through genuine pride, mutual respect, and the recognition that we’re all citizens of the same country. Kiwis are some of the most patriotic people you’ll ever meet. There’s a pride that runs deep in this country — pride in our way of life, pride in the freedoms we enjoy, and pride in the fact that we’ve created a society which, despite its flaws, is still one of the best in the world to live in. We’re fiercely protective of our home, our culture and our shared history. So when we talk about Maori and Pakeha relations, it’s important to remember that the vast majority of New Zealanders — regardless of their background — are united in their love for this country. They want a future where we can all live side by side as equals, without the need for separate laws or separate systems of governance. This isn’t about ignoring the past or rejecting the Treaty; it’s about building a future that reflects the reality of what New Zealand is today: a diverse but unified country, where every person, regardless of their ancestry, has the same rights and accountabilities. Many activists will try to tell you that New Zealand’s history is one of unrelenting oppression. They will paint colonisation as an unmitigated evil. Yes, colonialism was never perfect but I'm damn sick of the ‘apologitis’ which has become nothing more than a political virtue signal. When Maori make a formal apology to the descendants of the almost-genocided Moriori, let me know and I’ll die on the spot from pure shock. Maori culture is invaluable and deserves respect, but so does the rest of New Zealand’s history and all of its people. The Hikoi protest is nothing short of divisive. Protest is a legitimate form of free expression but when it’s used as a weapon to tear apart a nation it crosses a tragic line. The Hikoi is driven by activists who insist on highlighting Maori grievances to the exclusion of everything else and only serves to entrench hatred in this land. What’s missing from the Hikoi is any genuine effort to heal and move forward together as one people. It’s one thing to acknowledge the past and its injustices, but it’s another entirely to hold the whole nation hostage to those grievances, as if the only way forward is by continually looking back upon one group of people. The reality is, most Kiwis want the same thing — respect for Maori culture and respect for our European heritage which gave us a parliament (and everything else). It’s time to stop using history as a weapon to divide us. New Zealand should be better than this. We don’t need more race-based activism; we need unity, a shared vision for the future, and a commitment to ensuring every Kiwi — regardless of their background— has an equal shot at success. Christopher Luxon’s weak-kneed approach to the Treaty Principles Bill is exactly what NZ does not need. At a time when Kiwis are yearning for strong leadership that stands up for unity and fair-mindedness, Luxon is pandering to the loudest voices, and it’s not just unmanly, cowardly and disgusting, it’s dangerous. Rather than taking a firm stand for one law for all New Zealanders, he’s bending over backwards to appease those pushing a race-based agenda. He’s sending the message that we’re willing to accept two sets of rules for two sets of people. That’s not leadership; that’s total capitulation. Kiwis are royally pissed at the constant ass-kissing. We want a New Zealand that’s united — not a country fractured along racial lines. Luxon should be advocating for the solid democratic principles that once built this country: equality before the law and a shared national identity, not this milquetoast compromising that does nothing but embolden the separatist nutters and their backward bollox of an agenda. Leadership is about making tough decisions, not chasing “likes.” By not facilitating a way forward for Winston Peters and David Seymour, both important leaders within his coalition government, to work together to achieve one law for all, shows you Luxon does not want that. Never trust a globalist. He has failed the leadership test. We need someone who will stand up for what’s right, not what’s convenient. So what’s the solution? It’s very, very simple: equality before the law. One law applies to all New Zealand citizens, no exceptions. We respect the past, but we don’t let it dictate the future needlessly. We celebrate our shared heritage — warts and all — and focus on building a country where everyone has a fair go regardless of their ancestry. That means ditching the guilt trips, the victimhood, and especially the craven pandering.
32 Comments
Max Sky
20/11/2024 01:25:22 pm
Luxon is a globalist more at home at Davos than the Beehive. Time for a change within National but who?
Reply
Dave
20/11/2024 03:23:12 pm
Maybe Shane Jones, or Maureen Pugh to name a couple...
Reply
Graeme
20/11/2024 01:31:33 pm
Olivia, Maori culture is not invaluable and does not deserve respect. Maori culture is violence, warfare, slaughter, cannibalism, slavery.... Poi dances and flax skirts are hardly culture.
Reply
Olivia
20/11/2024 06:43:50 pm
I disagree Graeme.
Reply
Chuck Bird
21/11/2024 10:59:19 am
As David Seymour has pointed our his British ancestors were barbaric. They used to burn :"witches" at the stake. The use of torcher was widespread.
Reply
Olivia
21/11/2024 07:15:20 pm
Chuck, that's Seymour being a dick... NZ was colonised during the Enlightenment... witch burnings etc were during the Reformation & counter-Reformation.
David
23/11/2024 03:12:53 pm
Witches were most often hanged, not burnt at the stake. The number of witches executed by whatever means in Britain and Europe from historical records is less than 1,000 over centuries. The number of Maori killed by Maori in the Musket Wars alone exceeds 30,000. The first Maori 'King" Te Wherowhero is claimed by Maori to have killed 70 prisoners with a blow to the head with his mere on one occasion.
Steve Taylor
20/11/2024 01:43:49 pm
Well said Olivia. I think you have enunciated perfectly the thoughts and feelings of the vast majority of ALL New Zealanders whatever their race, ethnicity or economic status.
Reply
Ted Mason
20/11/2024 03:17:06 pm
Eloquently and succinctly put. Luxon is actually worse than a mere milquetoast: he said at a press conference the other day that the Treaty is a partnership (it isn't, of course), and he is reported to have said recently that New Zealand is not in danger of civil war. He would not have said the latter if he did not think that it is, in fact, a real prospect.
Reply
Olivia
20/11/2024 06:20:29 pm
Ted, you’re right - his “partnership” talk is nothing Jacinda wouldn’t have said.
Reply
Peter
20/11/2024 03:37:10 pm
I wrote to Prime Minister Luxon outlining my concerns which you have mirrored throughout your text. I got back the same tick box rhetoric and I don't know what I expected. Perhaps "your view has been noted" at least. At least he knows he's no longer on my Xmas card list.
Reply
Michael Hewitt
20/11/2024 05:33:53 pm
Eloquent words with logic reason and intelligence.
Reply
g roydhouse
20/11/2024 10:49:35 pm
Impressive.. and accurate summary.
Reply
Jenny Doyle
21/11/2024 12:25:48 am
Yes will written but I personally can't abide by her total ignoramus cognitive dissonance when it comes to Israel and it's continuing all out genocide no holds barred..she's a fucking Zionist thru and thru!
Reply
Graeme
21/11/2024 02:12:24 am
I always find the foul mouths of the left-wing so attractive, don't you ?
Reply
jenny
21/11/2024 11:06:15 pm
ahh Graeme, one shouldn't assume ones leanings judging by their opinions! ..or should I say what language one uses (appropriate or not) You see , I am no more 'so called' Left' than I am of the other label 'Right Wing' ha ha I just stick to what I believe is right based on many years of self education as a Truth seeker ,joining the dots to where we are today..and where we are right now speaks for itself .
Olivia
21/11/2024 07:02:24 pm
Jenny, I know it's really hard for women to do, but always best to stick to the topic at hand. If you wanna talk about my Zionism, there are many blogs on my site where you can leave a comment. ;-)
Reply
Olivia
21/11/2024 07:06:01 pm
Also Jenny, if you have problems with my Zionism... wait until you get to deal with my so-called misogyny.
Jenny
21/11/2024 11:48:09 pm
" but always best to stick to the topic at hand". ... Fair do's Olivia, and I apologize for my rude remark..not professional! AS for your blogs re Zionism one can only knod ones head in pure frustration. Yes you are an excellent writer and think you are so smart, yet you obviously don't get that your slant of history and its false narratives are the Mainstream version dictated by the 'Powers that be' ..the same powers that conjured up and enforced the Covid bullshit onto the World.
mark
21/11/2024 11:13:12 pm
no argument here.
Reply
Jenny
21/11/2024 11:53:22 pm
misogyny ..hmmm don't think this subject comes close to anything i'd be wasting any time on tiime on ..any time soon.
Reply
mm
22/11/2024 04:19:05 pm
Often struck by the intermarriage between Maori and English when I turned up 20 odd years ago from OZ. The two cultures at a family level had seemed to have joined together and became one. Many workmates had Maori English families. The divisive propaganda is quite recent, top down, pushed by a strident angry group. It will not hold. I find the Haka quite embarrassing though. A celebration of stoneage keyboard warrior violence in a dance?
Reply
22/11/2024 08:56:27 pm
Being pretty hardened to what partisan scum make up NZ's legacy media, I was still surprised by their brazen support for the Maori Party's hikoi.
Reply
Olivia
24/11/2024 08:11:39 pm
Red, absolutely.
Reply
Mark
23/11/2024 06:36:34 pm
Are you sure that Luxon isnt just being a tolerant Christian, and not being too pushy to seem like a bully. He has 2 deputies under him to do that, and he may have more to gain by playing the long game. The govt Coalition seems to be sticking to their script, and if they can out maneuver their opponents and critics, they can get a second term in office.
Reply
andrew
24/11/2024 01:44:18 am
First time I have read any of your thought pieces and it was considered and to me seemed to make a lot of sense. Thank you.
Reply
Stephen Coote
24/11/2024 01:19:51 pm
Thank you for writing this so well.... and for publishing it. You have saved me a lot of time. Instead of writing posts myself I can now share your link. I will, however, be making a submission on the 'Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi' bill. Best wishes from Nelson, NZ.
Reply
Mark
24/11/2024 11:55:38 pm
One law for all sounds good in theory, but it looks to me like lots of land was taken and stolen from Maori after the Treaty of Waitangi was signed. Even Nelson tenths land deal with Nelson Maori was not honored by the Crown. Thats why I think some grievances are real, particularly land grievances. I am interested to know how you hold a credible position, while ignoring all the land theft that took place while the Crown was in charge.
Reply
Stephen Coote
25/11/2024 01:54:29 pm
I think investigations and any compensation relating to so called 'land theft' are entirely separate to what the Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi bill is trying to achieve.... and I believe David Seymour has virtually stated this. There is legislation which talks about the Treaty and its 'principles'... but it is unclear what those principles are. David has proposed a set of principles to be debated in the Parliamentary process. Winston Peters has indicated that it may be better to remove all reference to Treaty principles in legislation instead. I think both David and Winston agree that specific breaches of the Treaty should continue to be debated.
Reply
Mark
25/11/2024 04:02:47 pm
An article today by Rob Hamlin in ODT about Treaty Bill reflected my suspicions that National and NZ First are largely ignoring Seymour and Hikoi activists, and are taking the 3rd way forward because it is politically expedient to do that. I trust Winston and Shane Jones to have a better grasp of how to proceed with Treaty issues, cos they are way more Maori than me, and Shane has said that he wont be guilt-tripped by those Maori activists. I am not a big fan of Seymour, but I think the whole Coalition is needed to take care of politics in our current Woke environment.
Reply
Olivia
25/11/2024 05:04:17 pm
Mark, totally agree - Seymour is actually quite the snake - I’m no fan of him, everyone knows that. Him tabling this Bill is bringing the issue of one law for all, the most important issue, to the fore. I think Winston Peters’ old "Deletion Bill" is a much better approach - but Luxon should be facilitating the ultimate solution to this divisive BS, between the two minor parties.
Doug Longmire
5/12/2024 02:08:10 pm
Regarding the biassed media coverage, this may give a clue:
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
Reality Check Radio: Six Hit Shows in One Week on the Assassination Attempt on Trump. NZ is Engaged!
Post Archives
December 2024
Links to Other Blogs |