This website uses marketing and tracking technologies. Opting out of this will opt you out of all cookies, except for those needed to run the website. Note that some products may not work as well without tracking cookies.
Opt Out of CookiesThis website uses marketing and tracking technologies. Opting out of this will opt you out of all cookies, except for those needed to run the website. Note that some products may not work as well without tracking cookies.
Opt Out of Cookies
By Olivia Pierson [First published on Incite 12/11/18] 17th November 2018 To: The Honorable Iain Lees Galloway & Kris Fafooi Immigration New Zealand 370 Airdale Street, Auckland 1010, New Zealand RE: Urgent asylum for Asia Bibi and her family from Pakistan Dear Sirs, I address you both in order to ask for New Zealand Immigration to offer asylum to Asia Bibi, her husband and her daughters from Pakistan. After recently being acquitted of blasphemy by the Pakistan Supreme Court, a charge which has seen Mrs. Bibi in prison on death row for eight years, her recent acquittal has sparked violent riots all over Pakistan and her life is so much in danger that she is now in hiding while trying to seek asylum in Western countries; which do not seem to be falling over themselves to give a woman and her family some much-deserved protection. The United Kingdom, due to their 1.17 million strong Pakistani community and their primitive threats of violence, have denied Asia Bibi asylum. They forget their liberal heritage and are now pandering to the highly intolerant adherents of a religion, whom their leaders have allowed to settle in the UK; obviously in too great numbers if they have this kind of political sway. Only three Imams in Britain supported her being given asylum. Three. This stance is a tragic disgrace for Britain – and is to their eternal shame. I do not recognise this Britain as being anything close to the once great country which led the allied forces, including our own, into battle to combat the threat of totalitarian force which Germany then posed. Asia Bibi is the victim of a totalitarian force in the form of an Islamic theocracy. She is a Christian woman and mother who was persecuted in a Muslim country and suffered unimaginable pains for her diversity of belief and speech. One of the great benefits of New Zealand as a democracy is that we have religious tolerance and freedom of speech enshrined in our laws of freedom. New Zealand prides itself on its liberal attitudes toward everything: the emancipation of women and children, freedom of religion and freedom of speech being among them. If ever there were a time for New Zealand to put its hand up in the protection of these rights, both publicly and as a matter of national conscience, I submit that it is now, for the protection of this family. Most other Western countries, the UK, Canada, Germany, France, Switzerland, Sweden and Norway have had to walk a path of genuflection to their Muslim communities in the case of Asia Bibi, to avoid violent uprisings. The United States is yet to take a stand and, to my knowledge, despite certain media personalities such as Andrew Bolt calling for Bibi and her family to find sanctuary in Australia, it has also not yet put its hand up to take action. Here is a chance for New Zealand to signal to the world that we are serious about human rights in our land. Religious refugees are welcome here so long as they abide by the liberal tenets that make our country a thriving democracy. I ask that you offer asylum to Asia Bibi, her husband and their daughters so that they can create their lives anew without the terrifying threat of sectarian violence, rape, acid attacks and murder dogging their every step. The persecution they face – something so alien and disgusting to the New Zealand mentality – is on the basis purely of being a Christian family in a Muslim nation. They need and deserve protection in New Zealand. New Zealand is a signatory of the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Let our nation’s signature on these Conventions actually mean something consequential in the times we live in. I ask that you direct New Zealand to lead the way in support of our precious Western freedoms and offer this family sanctuary on the other side of the world, a world which has so far shown them an indescribably cruel and barbaric face. Yours sincerely, Olivia Pierson Auckland New Zealand www.oliviapierson.org
It’s only fair to share ;-)
1 Comment
By Olivia Pierson [First published on Incite 14/11/18] US Army soldier, Private Bowe Bergdahl, disappeared into the Afghanistani wilderness in June of 2009. He was missing for the next four weeks until the Taliban released videos of Bergdahl being held in their custody, thus signifying his capture. Before he disappeared from his base, Bergdahl had his computer mailed back to his parent’s house in the United States. In his last email to his parents he wrote: “mom, dad… The future is too good to waste on lies…and life is way too short to care for the damnation of others, as well as to spend it helping fools with their ideas that are wrong… I have seen their ideas and I am ashamed to even be american… The horror of the self-righteous arrogance that they thrive in… It is all revolting…The system is wrong…I am ashamed to be an american… And the title of US soldier is just the lie of fools… The US army is the biggest joke the world has to laugh at. It is the army of liars, backstabbers, fools, and bullies. The horror that is america is disgusting. There are a few more boxes coming to you guys. Feel free to open them, and use them.” His father, Bob Bergdahl, responded by email: “OBEY YOUR CONSCIENCE! Dear Bowe, In matters of life and death, and especially at war, it is never safe to ignore ones’ conscience. Ethics demands obedience to our conscience. It is best to also have a systematic oral defense of what our conscience demands. Stand with like minded men when possible. Dad.” In an effort to get Bergdahl back, the US Army conducted significant search and recovery operations in which men lost their lives and others received horrific injuries which ruined their military careers. Bergdahl’s platoon comrades asserted that, after his desertion and capture, there was a dramatic increase in operational attacks by the Taliban on US forces. They believe Bergdahl gave useful information to a brutal and ferocious enemy. Bergdahl claimed that he was kidnapped, his brothers-in-arms claimed he deserted. In 2014, after Bergdahl had been with the Taliban for five years as a P.O.W., President Obama negotiated for his release in exchange for the Taliban Five detained in GITMO. Breaking the rule of ‘no negotiation with terrorists’ and also by-passing the lawful permission required from his own Congress, Obama handed over five top Taliban leaders into the oversight of Qatari officials, knowing full well that the Taliban had political offices in Qatar. When criticised for this action just after the transfer, Obama responded: “I wouldn’t be doing it if I thought that it was contrary to American national security. And we have confidence that we will be in a position to go after them if, in fact, they are engaging in activities that threaten our defences.” Obama had his then National Security Advisor, Susan Rice, be circulated around on media shows to make the statement that: “Bergdahl served the United States with honour and distinction.” During Bergdahl’s court-martial on November 3, 2017, he pleaded guilty to desertion and misbehaviour before an enemy. He was sentenced to be dishonourably discharged. The Taliban Five are now working actively for the terror organisation, which, given their staunch orthodox interpretation of Islam and their connections to Al Qaeda heads, like the late Osama bin Laden, resembles to many a grave problem for peace negotiations with Kabul and a direct threat to US forces. Some of these men were in top leadership positions when they ruled from Kabul before the US intervention after 9.11 forced them to flee. It is obvious that once again the anti-American President Obama acted against the security interests of his own country while he was Commander-in-Chief. If you enjoyed this article, please buy my book "Western Values Defended: A Primer"
It’s only fair to share! :-)
|
Post Archives
December 2022
Links to Other Blogs |