So now this contentious 2016 presidential election has turned terribly comical. Trump is being slaughtered in the press over a lewd leaked tape by the puritanical mob which likes to pretend that men are not attracted to the physical anatomy of women. What planet is this? Obviously one on which we are not ever allowed to acknowledge the power of Darwin’s Sexual Selection. I guess this is what you get when a secular Deist joins forces with the Christian Right in a feminist post-modern culture.
Christian or agnostic, all red blooded heterosexual men cannot pretend, and should not be expected to pretend, that the bodies of women don't attract them sexually - and intensely. If I hear one more morally damning comment along the lines of “because I have a daughter” – as if it is not within all our daughters’ interests that menfolk biologically feel this way about womenfolk. It is the feminist agenda, along with the repressed religious mentality which forces men to never say this out loud (despite the evidence of a 97 billion dollar per-year porn industry). That is not to say that other aspects of women are not also attractive to decent men i.e. our intellects, our vivacity and our other feminine virtues, but at the level of Darwinian (or God's) sexual selection, feminine anatomy matters a great deal toward the reproduction of a family, as does a man’s ability to provide for it, and any man (or woman) who denies this is a liar, or a wimp, or a wannabe homosexual.
To the feminist Republican women out there who choose to feel nothing but outrage over these facts, I say: would you prefer your lover to feel the same platonic level of feeling toward you that he would feel toward his mother, his sister, or a nun? Or would you like him to feel intense sexual feelings toward you? No matter how distasteful you find this natural state of affairs, it happens to include your breasts, your butt and your vagina.
To the religious men who like to make out that sexual attraction toward women is only ever horribly “low” or “base” – are you really going to deny that part of the attraction toward a woman that you feel is not her body? I dare you to tell that lie.
And to Hillary Rodham Clinton, who was the obvious beneficiary and perpetrator of releasing this so called “damning” hot mic tape, I say: Why have you stayed married to a man whom you know raped Juanita Broaddrick (among others)? Why did you keep up a marriage of convenience to a man who obviously cannot keep his penis in his pants, even during his time inside the sacred walls of the Oval Office? I know, I know, “he’s a hard dog to keep on the porch.” How forgiving. Jesus must just love you.
And, Hillary, most saliently of all, why did you act as a lawyer to get a rapist of a twelve year old girl, whom you knew to be guilty of rape, off the charge of first degree rape and then boast about how clever you were to get him a much lighter sentence? As if you give a toss about women! This poor twelve year old (now a 53 year old woman with an intact memory) was raped into a five day coma by two men at once and was never able to have children because her reproductive organs were so damaged by the event. You, Hillary Clinton, have the soul of a psychopathic murderer and rapist, and so does your dog of a husband. Yet here you are pretending to be a morally outraged defender of women - outraged by Trump’s mere locker-room comments about his lustful thoughts when he was a businessman, not a politician, as you have been your entire life. You’re a disgrace, a liar and a fraud. He is just a red blooded bloke with a big mouth. As far as the lesser of two evils goes, I’d take the male mammal boasting in a bus to another male mammal on any day of the week. At least he is consistent with normal human nature, whereas you are one twisted sister blinded by the neurotic entitlement of a scorned queen.
For the Republic’s sake people, wise up and get your judgements in order! Men find women intensely sexually desirable – but it seems they are never ever allowed to make this fact known without being damned by all who would prefer that human nature were not quite this way – namely asexual Feminists and repressed Religionists. The Republic has survived despite you, not because of you, so you can take your righteous indignation and stick it where the love of Jesus don’t shine. Make no mistake, the survival or your hard fought for Republic depends upon you being able to make the distinction between bawdy man big-talk and pure female malevolence.
If you enjoyed this article, please buy my book "Western Values Defended: A Primer"