This website uses marketing and tracking technologies. Opting out of this will opt you out of all cookies, except for those needed to run the website. Note that some products may not work as well without tracking cookies.
Opt Out of CookiesThis website uses marketing and tracking technologies. Opting out of this will opt you out of all cookies, except for those needed to run the website. Note that some products may not work as well without tracking cookies.
Opt Out of Cookies
Why Sneer at Capitalism? By Olivia Pierson “We're at war with the most dangerous enemy that has ever faced mankind in his long climb from the swamp to the stars, and it's been said if we lose that war, and in so doing lose this way of freedom of ours, history will record with the greatest astonishment that those who had the most to lose did the least to prevent its happening.” When United States President Ronald Reagan spoke these words to the world he had in mind an enemy not dissimilar to the one we face today, though now it’s even more entrenched. No, I’m not referring to Islamofascism (though if the cap fits), I’m referring to the war of social systems; Capitalism versus Everything Else. It seems that wherever I turn my attention these days capitalism is spoken about in a sneering, pejorative tone - as mindless as it is disheartening. Before capitalism’s meteoric rise in America and Europe during the 19th Century, the living standard for most citizens of the world was something very akin to what we would now call poor, unless you were born into inherited riches. Capitalism was a new social and economic system in line with the new political ideology of individual rights. This meant that any human being, regardless of creed, race or family position could pit herself against the odds and rise or fall on the basis of nothing but her own efforts, and sometimes in the process achieve unimaginable wealth, creating employment all around her. Did poverty still exist? Yes, of course it did and does, but capitalism inherited poverty, it did not create it, as many would now have us believe. It has been poverty’s most significant widespread cure. Capitalism recognises the self as one’s own highest value, and the freedom to trade with another person or not, to be a purely voluntary step. But its greatest achievement is the unchained creative mind, without which innovation and technology are not possible. The degree to which any land is truly flourishing is the degree of its economic freedom. People often make the mistake of thinking that morality has little to do with economics, but nothing could be further from the truth. If morality is defined as “the right and wrong of things as pertaining to human conduct”, consider that the ability to voluntarily choose the depth and breadth of one’s livelihood in accordance with one’s own personal goals, is a deeply moral affair. If we again cast our minds back to the 19th Century, before capitalism had become America’s only form of social system, the feudal South dogmatically held on - and was even fighting to extend – the dehumanising stain of black-slavery for the sake of their farming economy. It was the industrialised, capitalist North which completely obliterated that method of turning a dollar, and it took only four years once they had made up their minds that it was war. Thank you President Lincoln! During the 20th Century, the story of capitalism in the free world lies in direct contrast to the Bolshevik Revolution of Russia, which brought communism into power for the following eight decades. Communism flatly rejected individual rights as a moral concept, and the Soviet Union nationalised all private business and all private capital, plummeting the totality of its citizenry into homogenised poverty. Collectivism was its binding code, subjugating the individual to the group (euphemistically called “the common good”) which meant that any individual had to sacrifice personal advantage and personal freedom to the State – upon the pain of death or the gulag. A totalitarian, miserable, human poverty-pen was the result. Meanwhile back in the free world, new phenomena began to emerge; the businessman, the businesswoman and the well-heeled middleclass. This in turn, and by default, helped those still on the breadline. Instead of a lowly laundress having one client who paid her 25 cents per day for a family’s washing to be cleaned and ironed, she now had multiple clients looking for her services resulting in a jump to earning $1.50 per day. This was the difference between her putting bread or putting beef on the family dinner table. It was also the difference between her being able to keep her children in school or not. These were not small differences, neither were they rare. If we are to keep this “way of freedom of ours” we must be able to defend its case against those who curse it so self-confidently. Fortunately, it’s not that hard to do considering capitalism’s benefits, though not perfect, are obvious, but it seems to have accepted a guilty conscience along the way for being far too successful. If you enjoyed this article, please buy my book "Western Values Defended: A Primer"
0 Comments
What was The Enlightenment? by Olivia Pierson The Enlightenment was the most important cultural movement to ever sweep the world. 18th Century Western civilisation convulsed with a vibrant intellectual energy fueling commerce, politics and art, turning the world upside down - it could be said the right way up. It lasted from the late 1600s to the early 1800s and is marked by history as a period of intense human questioning, education and change. It is remembered now as the Age of Reason. Above all, The Enlightenment valued scientific inquiry through factual analysis, especially in respect to the physical universe and its natural laws. Dogmatic religious beliefs found themselves at war with reason. This threatened the very structure of state governments and ruling monarchies, calling into doubt the idea that kings should rule people through God-given divine right. All of Europe and America was affected by The Enlightenment over this 100 year intellectual thunder, but how? Through the widespread availability of printed books, a result of the printing press. The printing press was to people living in this time what the internet is to us today - a powerful way to spread ideas and learn. Cultures bound together and influenced each other, some separated over their differences. In 1776 America broke away from the English king George III, and fought a fierce and bloody revolution; thus beginning the noble experiment of democratic self-governance. Standing in stark contrast to the Dark Ages, the thousand years which came before it, The Enlightenment can be thought of as a time when the lights in the mind of the common man started to glow brighter. The road for this had already been paved by the philosophers, artists and writers during the Renaissance period, who steadily questioned what in the world was true and consistent with facts. Did the earth orbit the sun or did the sun orbit the earth? Did God make the world or did it begin as a result of purely physical laws? If God did exist, did he intervene in the lives of men? Should nations have a favoured religion or church power? Why should a king be obeyed instead of a parliament of men? What makes something beautiful? What is great art and what purpose does it serve, if any? How do human beings live a good life? What is happiness? Enlightenment flourishing was really a direct result of The Renaissance, which had occurred 200 years earlier, and the period in which the printing press had been invented. Renaissance literally means "rebirth" - and the ideas which were reborn as popular again had once been the quests of Ancient Greece and Rome, the classical period from 2000 years before, the time in which democracy had first been practised. Most essentially their quests were: Reason, Freedom and Beauty. If you enjoyed this article, please buy my book "Western Values Defended: A Primer" |
Post Archives
July 2023
Links to Other Blogs |