As Surely as Night Follows Day, the Democrats Will Try to Cheat

By Olivia Pierson
First published on Insight@theBFD 30/07/2020

During the 2016 U.S election debates between candidates Trump and Clinton, Hillary began to spin the narrative around what would later become the Russia collusion hoax. 

Often referring to Trump as “Putin’s puppet,” Clinton also made common reference to Russian election meddling and claimed that the election of Trump to the White House would be a great gift to Putin.

Hillary knew this to be orchestrated nonsense.

Fred Fleitz, former chief of staff to the National Security Council, says that then-CIA Director John Brennan “suppressed the truth and put forward lower quality intelligence to claim the Russians backed Trump.”  Fleitz explains:

“House Intelligence Committee staff told me that after an exhaustive investigation reviewing intelligence and interviewing intelligence officers, they found that Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.”

Russia collusion was a shabby little ruse which was given maximum and relentless amplification by the MSM.  There was no truth to it. Mueller’s special counsel investigation findings proved this to be so.

During one of the 2016 presidential debates, Fox News’ Chris Wallace asked both candidates if they were prepared to accept the results of the election, no matter who won. Clinton answered in the affirmative. Trump did not commit to a clear answer, “I’ll have to see what happens,” he said. (In his interview with Wallace just two weeks ago, he gave an identical answer to the same question.)

On the night of her defeat, it is rumoured Clinton had such a dramatic emotional meltdown that she had to be given Xanax and restrained from physically assaulting her campaign managers Robbie Mook and John Podesta. Appallingly, she even failed to attend her costly gathering at the Javits Centre to give a concession speech to her waiting, shell-shocked supporters. She hadn’t even written one. She sent Podesta out instead to “clean up the mess.”

By May 2017, Clinton openly declared herself to be “part of the resistance” along with all the other peevish losers who bitterly refuse to call Trump “the President,” instead repairing to the dehumanising title, “the occupant of the White House.”  So much for accepting the election result.

We are now watching a plot form before this year’s November election that is equally as perverse as the Russia hoax proved to be.

Joe Biden, who obviously has some kind of dementia in play, is not fit to run as a presidential candidate and Democrats who happen to be paying attention are fretting in their pantaloons – but hey, anything’s better than another Trump win in their eyes. Those around Biden who know him well and must be firsthand witnesses to his cognitive decline, are trying to hoodwink the American people over something as important to civilisation as a free and fair election during a time of cultural unravelling. Biden won’t even agree to in-depth interviews such as the one Trump just did with Chris Wallace. Wallace, a Democrat, has extended invitations (plural) to Biden, but Biden’s handlers have repeatedly declined.

Thomas L. Friedman of the New York Times wrote a recent op-ed advising Biden to not consent to partaking in this year’s traditional presidential debates unless Trump consents to making his tax returns public – yet another ruse to see that Biden avoids the mental rigours of live debates. Friedman’s opening line is, “I worry about Joe Biden debating Donald Trump.”  He’s far from being alone. If Biden demands Trump’s tax-returns, Trump should demand Biden’s neurological records.

On top of this chicanery, while milking that almighty catch-all excuse of the current COVID pandemic, Democrats are trying to force all 50 states to swiftly legislate for en-masse mail-in ballots instead of the usual face-to-face voting at a booth. 

Mail-ins are notoriously prone to error in the form of voter pressure from friends and family members, unverifiable identities and time delays in the postal system. Then there’s the practice of ballot harvesting, where one person drops off hundreds of collected ballots at a time for the count, rather than only an officially designated person acting for the voter. In many states this practice is illegal, since it opens the door to fraud and coercion, as well as delaying accurate election results on the night.
 
Democrats have proved themselves to be so deranged about all things Trump – and so desperate in their dirty tactics to win at any cost, as surely as night follows day, they will cheat.

When Wallace asked Trump if he would accept the results of this year’s election, his response, “I’ll have to see what happens,” was a crucially honest and sensible answer. If en masse mail-in voting takes place, it could well be a contested election since fraud and I.D inconsistencies statistically will be much more likely.  That’s hardly rocket-science and shouldn’t be news to anyone.

Brian Klass of the Washington Post – a Democrat organ stuffed full of fake news wrote these words this week, “President Trump is laying the groundwork to do something that no previous president has ever done: falsely claim that an election was fixed against him in order to discredit the vote.”

All the warning lights are blinking red. University of Birmingham professor Nic Cheeseman, an expert on contentious elections and political violence… normally worries when contested votes happen in Kenya or Zimbabwe. Now, he’s worried about the United States. “There are five warning I always look for,” he told me. “Organized militias, a leader who is not prepared to lose, distrust of the political system, disinformation, and a potentially close contest. Right now, the U.S. has all five.”

That’s a Democrat projection, again.

Rather amusingly, writers such as Klass make every effort to lock the attention of Americans myopically onto the blinking red warning lights in a bid to make sure they tune out the screaming fire alarms as the sprinklers rain down.

Why?

Because organised militias and radical mob violence are happening in broad daylight as I write this, thanks to ANTIFA and Black Lives Matter activists – and they’re all Democrats. 

There’s also the inconvenient fact that the elites of Obama’s administration refused to accept Trump as their elected president and colluded with intelligence agencies, not only to spread disinformation, but also to criminally use government apparatus to spy on Trump’s campaign team, his transition team and his early administration during his presidency.

This has served to give the American people one hell of a stark lesson in just how corrupted the political system had become during the Obama years. It truly was untrustworthy.  This also remains the reason why we’re currently awaiting John Durham’s report to find out exactly just how deep that vein of corruption ran.

Now the same people are seriously running an old man with dementia for president, and they’re trying to pretend he’s capable of filling the shoes of that titanic role, when it’s obvious to observers that Biden’s yet to be chosen Vice President is the person who will become the leader of the Free World, as Biden flakes out onto the soft, fuzzy sofas of la-la-land should he win.

This year’s Democrat election playbook is a ruse, wrapped in a ploy, inside a deception – with swindle on top.  Just as it was in 2016.

If you enjoyed this article, please buy my book "Western Values Defended: A Primer"