This website uses marketing and tracking technologies. Opting out of this will opt you out of all cookies, except for those needed to run the website. Note that some products may not work as well without tracking cookies.
Opt Out of Cookies
“Down with Dobbs!” – Why the distress following the recent SCOTUS abortion ruling doesn’t add up20/10/2022 
Written by Mariah Turnbull Vannoort Posted by Olivia The recent United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) decision to overthrow Roe v Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v Casey (1992) has again reignited the abortion debate. Many took to either the literal or proverbial streets preaching outrage and brandishing the standard placards. Before spontaneously combusting in indignation however, it is imperative to reflect on the decision in the appropriate Governmental system context. The United States’ Tripartite system splits governance into three distinct branches - the Legislative, Executive and Judicial. The Supreme Court is the highest court under the latter arm and its primary purpose is to interpret laws and ascertain whether there is a 'Constitutional right' to something. Contrary to the universal media response, the recent SCOTUS decision was certainly not the implementation of a blanket abortion ban across the US. Instead, in Dobbs vs. Jackson Women’s Health Organization 2022, the Court found no 'Constitutional right' to abortion and therefore delegated the decision back to the individual States where their elected representatives would have the power to determine their own State-wide laws on the issue. And thence came the cries of consternation... "A dark day for Democracy!" One of the downsides of democracy is, quelle horreur, that you might lose. The US' Tripartite system is structured precisely to dissolve power and make it near-impossible for anyone to make sweeping changes according to their own agenda. Cries that the Justices should have decided otherwise reveals that these ‘Elites’ believe the system should be kept only if the majority agree with them and be hastily discarded when they do not. It is down this 'Democracy if I win, Totalitarianism if I don't' path however that we travelled with the vaccine mandates. When it became clear that the 90% vaccinated goal could not be reached using ‘encouragement' alone, democracy was discarded in favour of authoritarian mandates. Consider what alternative is being proposed by those most outraged; a system where the Supreme Court veers away from their fundamental Judicial purpose, codifying un-Constitutional rights provided they align with the self-appointed, moral-Elite’s views – which must be entirely honourable because they come from deep within their gilded souls, a place impervious to evil? SCOTUS deciding that they do not have the power to legalise abortion on behalf of all US citizens given it isn't contained in the Constitution is the epitome of democracy - lest we forget that this is their primary, Judicial purpose. "My Body, My Choice!" Ah, the age-old fight for so-called bodily autonomy. The truth? - many of those calling for bodily autonomy do not actually believe in it. It is nothing but shameless hypocrisy to pretend to subscribe to the 'bodily autonomy' club after consenting to the vaccine mandate approach. In the words of American comedian Tyler Fischer, "I'd go to the My Body My Choice protest tonight but I'm not vaccinated so wouldn't be welcome there." “Reproductive Rights Equals Racial Justice!” Cue Lizzo, the American singer/rapper who describes herself as a “fat black woman in America" who pledged $500k from her upcoming tour to go to Planned Parenthood. Below is her reasoning. 
Note the first astute comment above – “the irony lmao.”
Lizzo insists “by this ban" - which ‘ban?' Either she genuinely believes that the decision has resulted in a Nationwide abortion 'ban' or is intentionally using false, inflammatory speech to start a contagion of moral outrage. With an Instagram following of 13 million (many of which are young, devoted females) and the above post receiving over 1.1 million ‘likes,’ either option seems at best, deeply dangerous. We can assume that the fight to cancel 'misinformation' doesn't apply to this celestial beacon of the self-appointed righteous class. As for the alleged disproportionate lack of access for "black women and women of colour," we must turn to history. Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, was quite inconveniently for Lizzo, a Eugenicist. She believed in sterilisation of the 'unfit' and ‘undesirable,' including the Black community. Planned Parenthood was originally called 'the Negro Project' – see below in her own words (Sanger, 1939). 
The argument that Black People have 'less access' to family planning resources? Black people are five times more likely to have an abortion than white women, abortion kills more Black lives than all other causes of Black deaths combined and 79% of Planned Parenthood’s surgical abortion facilities are strategically located within walking distance of African and/or Hispanic communities. And yet Lizzo, a Black woman, still wants to fight to keep her organisation alive? To quote the title of Lizzo’s hit song, the Truth Hurts.
"Abortion on demand and without apology!" President Clinton coined the term 'safe, legal and rare' which was accepted by much of his Democratic party in the 1990s. Now, the supposed 'pro-choice' movement considers any utterance of the requirement for 'rarity' blasphemous - abortion is a sacrament apparently, something to be immensely proud of. Pride, as Jordan Peterson so rightly pointed out, has joined its compatriots’ lust, gluttony and sloth, as once-cardinal sins that should now be celebrated. Undoubtedly the 'Abortion Pride' flag’s frenzied flapping will be emanating from a flagpole near you soon. So in short, the robe-laden chosen few decided that they should pass power on this deep issue back to the people's elected representatives to decide. They did so against all odds including the entire media and ‘Elite’ class being against them, an unprecedented document leak intended to dissuade them and a genuine assassination attempt on one justice’s life. We, the people should be positively delirious, engaged in fervent celebration that democracy won against these odds. Instead? Collective mourning. Those most-outraged would almost certainly fall apart (along with their purported morals) if asked even the most basic questions about the Dobbs decision. So which crime should they be charged with? Benevolent ignorance - having fallen prey to the talons of Lizzo-type propaganda? Or something more malicious - knowingly spreading false information to destroy the democratic institutions that stand between us and those ghastly authoritarian regimes. In the words of Justice Alito, "It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives." Amen. References Fischer, T. (2022, June 25). Twitter Lizzo. (2022, June 14). Instagram Lizzo. (2022, June 25). Instagram Protecting Black Life Organisation. (n.d.). Protecting Black Life Organisation Sanger, M. (1939, December 10). Smith College Libraries States, S. C. (2022, June 24)
2 Comments
Declaration of NZDSOS
By Olivia Pierson What does a perfidious government do when it forces a nation into injecting an experimental medication that results in a massive rise in all cause mortality? Easy! It sets about changing yet another law so that causes of deaths remain even murkier to ascertain. Enter the Coroner’s Amendment Bill. The following was published on the New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out with Science website on 10/10/2022. ____ A Report on Submissions to the Coroner’s Amendment Bill by NZDSOS A Bill proposed by The Honourable Aupito Sio to amend the Coroner’s Act 2006 is going through the House currently. The purpose of the proposed changes is to speed up time to resolution for families as cases are currently taking years to reach a conclusion. Proposed Changes to the Coroners Act 2006The Bill proposes 4 targeted amendments to the principal Act:
Justice Select Committee Written submissions were due by 28 Sept 2022 and oral submissions were heard on 6 October 2022 by the Justice Select Committee, the members of which are listed below. You can watch their short comments on the Bill at this link: Ginny Andersen Labour Vanushi Walters Labour, lawyer Paul Goldsmith National Emily Henderson Labour, lawyer Nicole McKee ACT Mark Mitchell National, ex Police Simon O’Conner National Willow-Jean Prime Labour, lawyer Arena Williams Labour, lawyer It is interesting to note that there are no medical people on this Select Committee and that the coronial service is run by the Ministry of Justice. Coroners in NZ are all from legal backgrounds. In other countries coroners can have legal or medical backgrounds. The Role of Coroners A deceased person is usually referred to a Coroner when a medical doctor is not able to write a death certificate because they are not confident of the cause of death or are not comfortable with the circumstances surrounding the death. Concerns About the Coroner’s Amendment Bill This Bill proposes to allow a legally trained person to sign off the cause of death as ‘unascertained natural causes’ when a medically trained person is unable to do so. That sounds fishy and the people of NZ think so too if the submissions are anything to go by. Several submitters spoke of a ‘slippery slope’. One suggested that rather than fobbing deaths off as ‘unascertained natural causes’, a more correct classification would be ‘sudden death – not investigated’. This would not improve the outcome for the bereaved but would be a more honest reflection of the situation. Several pathologists and forensic pathologists spoke (Simon Stables, Paul Morrow, Leslie Anderson and Kate White) and voiced their concerns about the lack of medical input and suggested that a pathologist or forensic pathologist be included in, or aligned with, the coronial service. Several people spoke about suicide and the protracted, unsupported, imbalanced, adversarial nature of the current coronial system. Submissions to the Coroner’s Amendment Bill Some of the oral submissions from 6 Oct 2022 can be watched at this link starting @35 mins and the rest at this link: There were over 2600 written submissions, the vast majority of them appearing to oppose the Bill. From glancing through a random selection (see below), it is easy to see that Kiwis who submitted are strongly of the opinion that this government is trying to hide something by bringing in this Bill at this time. The full written submissions can be read at this link: Most people suggested if the service was struggling, it should not be replaced with an inferior less-robust service, but rather be better resourced and funded. Many also stated that more investigation, not less, should be occurring in the context of excess mortality following the rollout of a novel medication that is still in phase 3 (due to finish Feb 2023) and phase 4 (post marketing surveillance) of a clinical trial. Will this be another government whitewash with a pre-determined outcome or will the select committee actually listen to the people of NZ? What Do Kiwis Think? “This is plainly a ploy by a corrupt, incompetent government to conceal the crimes being committed by the health authorities in the treatment of a trumped up pandemic. Many people have been murdered in this process and action needs to be taken to bring these wrong doers to justice, not pass laws to sweep their crimes under the carpet. It is time to stop murdering New Zealanders and bring the perpetrators to justice. This amendment does the opposite.” ——-- “I strongly disagree with the proposed amendments. They are so open to abuse, clearly the intention is to hide/ignore the large increase the current “all cause mortality” we are experiencing since the covid jab roll out. Every case of heart disease, vascular disease and cancer needs to be investigated and the link to “vaccination status” needs to be entered on all death certificates. I absolutely oppose this amendment to the bill. It is just another way this labour government is trying to hide its medical injustices from the COVID vaccine. Disgusting. There is no way coroners should be allowed these rights. All findings should be made public.” ——-- “The Coroners Amendment Bill is completely unacceptable, and seemingly a blatant attempt of the Ardern Government to cover their tracks. It lacks transparency and is a total breach of upholding democracy. It is a “Get Out Of Jail Free Card” being enacted by the Ardern Government to benefit any potential wrong doing by the Ardern Government in any future Court or Judicial proceedings.” ——-- “The changes you are proposing to the Coroners Amendment Bill are NOT acceptable. People need to know the reason why a loved one has died unexpectedly. These proposed changes lack transparency and reek of a coverup.” ——-- “I oppose the change what are you trying to hide? Why has their workload increased? Leave it as is I believe this is just a cover up of the deaths that have happened due to the covid vaccines.” ——-- “In my opinion this Amendment Bill, should be stopped, it cannot go ahead. It looks very shady almost like some people have something to hide.” ——-- “This amendment makes me think the Government are trying to hide something. Total lack of Transparency! I for one do not want this bill to go ahead. Thankyou for letting me have my say.” ——-- “I oppose the proposed Coroners Amendment Bill, because it does not protect the public from injustice, which is the main function of the Ministry of Justice. If any Tom, Dick or Harry, without any medical knowledge, are appointed to make judgements without proper investigation into the actual and true cause of death, then anything can be recorded as a “Natural Death”. This looks like an easy way out of a tragic situation, with nothing and no one held accountable. I’m sure the Ministry of Justice can do better to uphold Truth and Honour in NZ.” ——-- “A Coroner’s job is to establish cause of death. Do not remove or reduce those requirements. Don’t hide the facts… let the truth out.” ——-- “This dishonesty from Jacinda Ardern, NZ Labour Party and our Government needs to stop. It is immoral and unethical and if they can’t stop being dishonest they need to step down asap. Always trying to cover their backsides instead of doing the right thing. Resign Jacinda, NZ Labour and anyone else who isn’t prepared to work honestly for ALL New Zealanders. Shame on you this Bill is atrocious and it should be banned immediately.” ——-- “Now is not the time to make these changes. It is vitally important that we look hard and truthfully at the effects of covid and also, more importantly, the vaccines. It must not be made easier to brush past potential red flags.” ——-- “This is not a good idea, please stop the bill from passing. A high majority of the country has taken an experimental vaccine which has caused severe adverse effects including death. In addition, there are unexplained significant increases in excess deaths around the world, including in the UK and NZ. We need reliable and accurate data to investigate and monitor these issues.” ——-- “I wish to say that I feel that this amendment is not in the interests of a transparent and democratic New Zealand.” ——-- “This Amendment Bill sniffs of avoidance of the truth that the ‘jab’ is causing most of the unexpected deaths. Truth will always be revealed.” ——-- “It reeks of “cover-up” and political control to allow the manipulation of a narrative and facts that may embarrass government ministers, ministries and agencies, whose policies and actions may result in unnecessary deaths. It is neither Open or Transparent.” ——-- “I do not support this! It is very very clear this is a cover up campaign over the roll out of the covid 19 jab! Ditch it and ditch Jacinda!” ——-- “We appear to have enough money in the Taxpayers coffers for all sorts of wonderful ideas, but when it comes to our Medical Rights there appears to be not enough to employ the required Medical professionals.” ——-- “As the increase in all-cause mortality can not be explained by Covid-19 deaths, the coroner needs to consider the impact of the vaccine. The vaccine is known to cause death and result in diseases which can lead to death.” ——-- “I disagree with the amendment, all deaths should be able to be investigated to find the true cause, this is a blatant excuse to cover up vaccine deaths.” ——-- “I do not wish any changes to be made to the coroners bill. I want there to be complete transparency around deaths especially deaths post COVId vaccine and post COVId. It is imperative that the coroners job is not messed with by those wishing to cover up any failings of the MRNA vaccine roll out. It’s concerning to hear that these changes are being recommended.” Report ends. ___ Two days later, on 12/10/2022, NZDSOS put out this article, accompanied by a media release: Coroner’s Amendment Bill Raises Serious Questions A report produced by New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out with Science (NZDSOS) on the Coroner’s Amendment Bill has brought up serious questions about investigation into death in New Zealand. A spokesperson for NZDSOS said, “It is clear on glancing through the submissions, New Zealanders see this amendment as a cover-up attempt, either by accident or design.” The Bill, which has had its first reading and is now with the Select Committee aims to speed up the process of coronial investigations so families are not left in limbo for years and to clear the current backlog of active coronial files. However, among the proposed recommendations of which one is to record deaths with a previously unheard-of classification ‘unascertained natural causes.’ Essentially this equates to ‘we don’t know what the cause of death is and we won’t be investigating it thoroughly.' This is a risky and reckless practice where deaths could be potentially swept aside, covered up or missed, leaving unanswered questions for families and whanau. In light of the vaccine roll out, New Zealand like many other countries are experiencing an alarming rise in all-cause mortality rates which has not been adequately explained. “The role of a comprehensive coronial service with the ability to do thorough investigations on an increased number of deceased people is more important now than ever before” said the NZDSOS spokesperson. MEDIA RELEASE: Coroner’s Amendment Bill Raises Serious Questions A report produced by New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out with Science (NZDSOS) on the Coroner’s Amendment Bill has brought up serious questions about investigations into deaths in New Zealand. A spokesperson for NZDSOS said, “it is clear on glancing through the submissions, New Zealanders see this amendment as a cover-up attempt, either by accident or design." The Bill, currently going through the House, aims to speed up the process of coronial investigations so family members are not left in limbo for years. Proposed recommendations include:
Written submissions were due on 28 Sept 2022. Oral submissions for the Bill were presented to the Justice Select Committee last week on October 6th. "The reactions from some of the committee were mixed, to say the least, but they know now that they are under scrutiny for any wrong-doing," said the spokesperson. There are at least two very good reasons why the Coroner’s Act and the role of the coroner should be strengthened at this time rather than watered down. New Zealand and countries across the planet, are in the middle of phase 4 clinical trial (post-marketing surveillance) for Covid-19 injections including the Pfizer injection used in NZ. The phase three Pfizer trial involving the original 44,000 participants is also ongoing. It is not due for completion until Feb 2023. “In a phase 4 clinical trial every death of a person who received the medication would typically be investigated and reported on,” said the spokesperson. This is clearly not happening and is likely to happen even less if a coronial associate can sign off a death as ‘unascertained natural causes." Many other countries, including New Zealand, are experiencing an alarming rise in all-cause mortality which has not been adequately explained. "The role of a comprehensive coronial service with the ability to do thorough investigations on an increased number of deceased people is more important now than ever before," said the spokesperson. Graham Fox--MEDIA LIAISON media@nzdsos.com FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Wednesday, October 12, 22 |
Post Archives
July 2023
Links to Other Blogs |
RSS Feed