by Olivia Pierson

Deputy Leader of Britain First’s patriotic movement, Jayda Fransen, who is facing jail time for “hate crime,” caused a furore again in the last 24 hours after President Trump retweeted her posts about  Muslim violence.

The Western media are, of course, falling over themselves to condemn both Jayda - and President Trump - by doing their best to discredit the videos and label both these people as Far Right Nutcases who incite Islamophobia (read criticise Islam).  Here is Jayda's twitter page. 

One video shows a Muslim beating up a dutch boy on crutches in the Netherlands.  Media outlets, including Fox News, are playing this down by saying that “Dutch Authorities” confirm the attacker is neither a muslim nor a migrant - these are the same “Dutch Authorities” no doubt who slapped Geert Wilders on hate speech charges and dragged him through the courts for “inciting racial hatred” in Holland. 

The next video shows a group of Muslim men throwing a boy off a building then beating him to death. This video is being discredited by media as irrelevant because it happened in Egypt.  Egypt is a Muslim country, so just how exactly is the video irrelevant to chronic Muslim violence?

The third video shows a Muslim cleric in Syria throwing a statue of the Virgin Mary off a balcony, smashing it to smithereens. Media aren't saying too much about this one since it's the most innocuous, unless the veneration of Mary is your thing.  But it certainly shows how the peddlers of Islam really feel about religious pluralism in their own countries (before they're welcomed into ours).

The reaction to President Trump's retweeting of Jayda’s videos has been enormous.  British PM Theresa May foolishly scolded him, along with the Archbishop of Canterbury - who demanded President Trump remove the posts from Twitter, forgetting that his role exists only to be the Head of the Church of England, not to be an advocate for Islam.  He needs to get his god straight.  He should also take a moment to consider that Jayda is doing what he should be doing, as head Anglican shepherd of the flock.

Jeremy Corbyn called the tweets "abhorrent, dangerous and a threat to our society.”  Labour MP Chuka Umunna is calling for Mr Trump's (that should be 'President Trump's' to the vacuous gentleman) state visit invitation to be withdrawn immediately, accusing the President of "normalising hatred.”  Former shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, urged Boris Johnson to condemn the “significant and serious” posts, adding that “The woman in question (Jayda Fransen) has already been convicted of hate crime in this country," and that Mr Trump had given her a "huge platform” (that should be ‘President Trump’ to the vacuous madam).

President Trump has responded with a beautifully salient message to Prime Minister May: “.@Theresa_May, don’t focus on me, focus on the destructive Radical Islamic Terrorism that is taking place within the United Kingdom. We are doing just fine!”

Amen to that... and by the way, how's Brexit going? Focus Ms. May, focus!

The charges against Jayda Fransen are dubious at best. Fransen has been charged with “using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour at the Northern Ireland Against Terrorism Rally” and is due to appear at Belfast Magistrates' Court on 14 December. This just means she criticised Islam in a speech - as if that is something that should bring forth charges of hate speech against a British citizen!  When was the last time someone in a Western country was charged with hate speech for criticising Christianity?  Freedom of religion also means freedom from religion, and criticism of all religion is fair game to those of us who don't believe in a god.

In November 2016, Fransen was convicted of religiously aggravated harassment after she so-called "harassed" a Muslim mother-of-four because she was wearing a hijab in a Luton town. She was fined almost £2,000 as the court heard she told a mother-of-four that Muslim men force women to cover up to avoid being raped 'because they cannot control their sexual urges', adding 'that's why they are coming into my country raping women across the continent.’

And indeed they are.

Frankly, Jayda Fransen deserves a medal for this, not a conviction.  Was it provocative?  Of course it was, but freedom of speech has traditionally existed in order to protect the provocative, and verbal provocation is absolutely nothing compared to the murderous terror rampages that British and European citizens have been subjected to in recent years at the hands of Muslims.

The scene can be seen here on the video below.  What is clear is that Jayda and other members of Britain First march through the British town in Luton holding a white cross before them while they give out leaflets.  Muslim business owners and shoppers come out of their stores en masse and hurl abuse at the group, while the group defend themselves by yelling back, “This is a christian country!  This is Britain!”

And indeed it is. Or was.

The sweet little quick-to-cry-victim “mother of four” in a hijab marches right up to Jayda in front of her own children, using aggressive and threatening language.  She declares Jayda to be “a slapper” while gesturing with her hands about Jayda’s Western clothing. Jayda retaliates verbally by saying, “Your men make you dress like that because they can’t control their urges… making you cover up so that you don’t get raped.” The sweet little quick-to-cry-victim "mother of four" gets full in Jayda’s face and hisses, “Piss off!” while giving her the finger (with the children watching).

Other sundry Muslim men follow the group discharging invectives - “cunt,” “fuck off,” and “slag.” An oft repeated rant from both the Muslim women and the men was, “We’re taking over - the Muslims are going to take over this country.”

I think Jayda can safely say, "I rest my case." This deeply aggressive sentiment among the Muslims is the reason for her provocation.  The British people have been too kind to these immigrants and children of immigrants, and this is how they will be thanked.

I didn’t hear Jayda or any of her companions resort to abusive language at all.  Yet, she and Britian First's leader, Paul Golding, were later arrested for this oh-so-terrible crime of walking down a British street carrying a bloody big cross in a country which, last time I checked, still retains a monarch as the Supreme Governor of the Church of England.

If you enjoyed this article, please buy my book"Western Values Defended - a Primer"


​

 
​By Olivia Pierson

In C.S Lewis’ artful little book titled, The Screwtape Letters, Uncle Screwtape is the older, more experienced demon who advises in letter form his young, impetuous nephew, Wormwood, on the finer points of how to win “the patient’s” soul toward hell and our Father Below. Uncle Screwtape instructs Wormwood, “the safest road to hell is the gradual one - the gentle slope, soft underfoot, without sudden turnings, without milestones, without signposts."

When Jacinda Ardern made her first appearance on the world stage this week at APEC in Vietnam, she talked with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau about the dubiously titled initiative ‘Feminist Foreign Policy.’  What on God’s green Earth is that, one may ask with a chilly shudder?

FFP is an initiative that has been pioneered in Sweden by Minister of Foreign Affairs, Margot Wallstrom, which she hopes to make a global initiative.

Here is a summary of what Sweden says this is about:

  "Summary: Sweden is the first country in the world to pursue a feminist foreign policy. The aim is to contribute to gender equality and the full enjoyment of human rights by all women and girls. The policy was launched in October 2014 and a follow-up by the Swedish Foreign Service has revealed an intensive implementation process that, in just three years, has made its mark at multilateral, regional and bilateral level, and in relation to all the objectives of the Foreign Service’s action plan. Efforts to achieve the action plan’s six external objectives have taken the following form..."

The said six objectives are these: Human Rights, Freedom from Violence, Participation in Politics, Participation in Peace Efforts, Economic Empowerment and Sexual and Reproductive Rights.

The curious thing is that these new "objectives" have already been part of the fabric of Swedish culture for many decades because it is a Western country and a social democracy.

According to their own official position, here is why Sweden thinks this initiative now needs to be pursued:

  "Why does Sweden pursue a feminist foreign policy? Systematic subordination is still commonplace for countless women and girls all over the world. Sweden, which wants to see an end to discrimination, is pursuing a feminist foreign policy, and is the first country in the world to do so. Recent years have unfortunately involved new setbacks for global gender equality efforts and women’s and girls’ full enjoyment of their human rights, making feminist foreign policy more important than ever. This policy is an agenda for change to strengthen the rights, representation and resources of all women and girls, implemented by the Swedish Foreign Service integrating a gender perspective in all its activities. "
​
Systematic subordination is still commonplace for countless women and girls all over the world?  Huh? Not in the West it isn’t - unless a country has allowed unprecedented numbers of misogynistic Muslim immigrants in.  Bingo.  This is the real reason that this sexist initiative has been hatched.

The initiative was kicked off right at the time ISIS became a thing and hundreds of Swedes left their Nordic homeland to go and fight for the diabolical terror group in Syria & Iraq.  Since then, those traitors who were not killed by coalition forces have been  let back into Sweden and given free counselling, a welfare cheque and housing privileges. 

But immigrant problems bedevilled Sweden before the Immigration Crisis of 2016.  Sweden has had the highest number of asylum seekers in Europe - 2015 alone saw 162,877 asylum applicants into the country of ten million. More than half of those were from just Syria and Iraq (71,000). Swedish Islamic immigration played a huge part in the sexual violence which hit Stockholm streets and beyond during the New Year celebrations of 2016.  Since then, sexual assault crimes toward Swedish women have been so prevalent that someone has released a handbook to put into Swedish schools which teaches Arab boys how to behave sexually in the West.

This is deeply ironic because as the National Review reports in February of this year, Sweden is so committed to its multicultural agenda that it forbids up-to-date crime stats which detail the ethnicity of the criminal as it is deemed “racist.”

  "Since then, Swedish criminologists and politicians have made sure that no new statistics have been released. Not a single recent research study in Sweden has attempted to estimate the causal effect of immigration on sexual assault or homicide rates. Parliament recently defeated a motion to produce up-to-date crime statistics based on national origin. We simply do not know what percentage of sexual assaults or homicides were committed by immigrants last year in Sweden."

Wallstrom is aware that Sweden cannot cope with the chronic influx of Islamic refugees, so she has put pressure on the EU to force other member states to take their “fair share.”  Don’t you just love it!  Because Sweden has acted suicidally toward their own culture, they require all other EU countries to act suicidally also - not that the EU needs any encouragement along this line. This is modern Europe’s way of sharing their sadomasochistic love.  Uncle Screwtape would be so proud!

The effete Justin Trudeau (who characterises himself as a feminist) welcomed large numbers of Islamic refugees into Canada, and has now picked up on the Swedish Feminist Foreign Policy Initiative.  He is sharing this initiative with Jacinda Ardern.  During their little chat at APEC in front of cameras, Ardern invited Trudeau to visit New Zealand.  She too has been very vocal lately about NZ taking in more Muslim refugees.

The trouble is that Islamic crime in Canada has suddenly shot up, especially in Ottawa which boasts a large Somali refugee population.

If Ardern acquiesces to this Feminist Foreign Policy twaddle (we know it would appeal to her) and imports more Muslim refugees into NZ, as we already know Human Rights Commissar, Susan Devoy advocates, these sinister crime statistics may yet become a fact of New Zealand also.  Godzone may become No-gozone, as many places within Swedish cities have become… oops!  Uncle Screwtape just reminded me they are called “vulnerable areas.” 

Can you see the fiendish pattern here?  A country commits itself to multiculturalism with a tut-tutting religious zeal reminiscent of the devout. Then they throw open their doors to misogynistic Third World refugees under the purist-sounding euphemism of “compassion.” When the refugees don’t assimilate well into Western culture and become over-represented in crime (especially rape and murder) the leaders of the country tell everybody it’s because of long-standing, systemic bigotry and sexism.  Then plans are hatched to counteract crime, but the statistics of who largely commits the crimes are obfuscated, so it’s blamed on an attitude which is said to be already inherent in the host culture as it descends into hell.

This is multicultural snobbery and villainous deceit so wicked that I wager Uncle Screwtape would've kicked himself for not being the one to think of it first. 


If you enjoyed this article, please buy my book"Western Values Defended - a primer"

By Olivia Pierson

When Trump took office at the beginning of this year, there were five main agendas that I considered monumentally important in judging the strength of his efficacy as Leader of the Free World: 
​ 
1. The US economy
2. Combatting ISIS
3. Stemming immigration through the Southern border
4. The ongoing menace of Iran going nuclear
5. Dealing with a nuclear armed North Korea

While the usual media outlets like to mundanely mimic the unduly negative narrative that President Trump’s first year in office has yielded very little, nothing could be further from the actual truth.

President Trump has accomplished in his first year of governing what his predecessors, Bush and Obama couldn’t do in both their two-terms combined: rebooting the American economy. This has been achieved largely by Trump’s commitment to his campaign promise of slashing regulations and increasing manufacturing.  For every new regulation imposed, two existing ones have to be cut.

GDP has increased from 1% growth to 3.1%.  Over a million new jobs have been created and unemployment is now down to 4.1%, the lowest it’s been since 2001. The stock market has set new record high after high throughout 2017. All this has taken place before tax cuts have even made it through to legislation.

In altering the terms of engagement by giving more decision-making power to his competent generals on the battlefield instead of to bureaucrats micromanaging like grannies from the Whitehouse, President Trump has swiftly advanced the defeat of ISIS.  The terror group has lost all its territory in Iraq and Syria, and hundreds of thousands of jihadist murderers have been killed.  Strictly speaking, they are not completely over, it is expected that they’ll morph into guerrilla units wherever they can, but after a year of intense focus on obliteration instead of “containment,” their hope of a caliphate has been blown back to hell, whence it came.  The biggest threat from ISIS now comes via muslims living in Western countries who carry out attacks in their name.  This remains a problem for each sovereign country to deal with, but all countries share intelligence with each other to help mitigate this ongoing threat. 

Since we have mentioned Syria, it is also worth noting that President Trump is the only leader in the world who had the balls to punish Assad for his use of chemical weapons on civilians in April of this year.  UN war crimes investigators confirmed in June 2017 that it was indeed Assad who committed this crime, not the rebel groups he tried to blame.

This criminal action of Assad flew in the face of the Geneva Convention, measures which ought to be enforced by all United Nations member states, but only President Trump enforced it by launching 59 cruise missiles at the al Sharyat airbase.  After developing a troubling habit of using chemical weapons on his own people, Assad has not resorted to this tactic since. Fancy that.

After Trump won the election and by the time he was inaugurated, the number of illegal immigrants crossing the Southern border dropped by 40% due to his rhetoric alone. Since then border crossings are now down by 71%, the lowest level since the year 2000. This is due to enforcing existing laws alone, without even building ‘the wall.’  Prototypes are now being erected which means the wall is still very much on the agenda.  When this does actually go up, illegal immigration through that border will be a thing of the past.  Washington politicians on both sides of the aisle have been running their yaps about how to stem illegal immigration through this border for thirty years.  President Trump has made unprecedented improvements on this issue in less than one year of his administration.  Unbelievable.

For many years, Iran has been under sanctions/restrictions by the UN over its ability to develop ballistic and nuclear weapons technology.  Most of these restrictions were rescinded when Obama cut the new Iran deal. Unfortunately, the new deal is almost unenforceable due to its weasel wording and as a result, Iran continues to violate the deal by continuing to openly test and develop ballistic weapons (while Iranians genocide bait on Quds Day this year; "Death to America! Death to Israel!  Death to the house of Saud! Death to the UK!") 

The wording of the previous UN resolution was this: 
“Iran shall not undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using ballistic missile technology, and that States shall take all necessary measures to prevent the transfer of technology or technical assistance to Iran related to such activities.” 

This is the wording under the new Iran Deal:
“Iran is called upon not to undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles designed to be capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using such ballistic missile technology, until the date eight years after the [Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action] Adoption Day or until the date on which the [International Atomic Energy Agency] submits a report confirming the Broader Conclusion,* whichever is earlier.”
(*the Broader Conclusion being that Iran only intends their nuclear plans for peaceful purposes)

Well, it has not been eight years since the signing of the deal, nor has the IAEA submitted a report confirming the Broader Conclusion, yet Iran constantly tests ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear warheads.  The latest test was in September 2017.  All Iran has to do is wait out eight years then they’re allowed to do whatever they want, but they have not even had the decency to wait thanks to the piss-weak wording of the deal.

Not only that, Iran is currently engaged in proxy wars in Lebanon (and seems to have won there), in Yemen, in Syria, in Iraq and is fomenting anti-Arab strife in Qatar, which has severed diplomatic relations between Qatar and the the UAE.

President Trump has decertified the deal and his position is this:
“We will not continue down a path whose predictable conclusion is more violence, more terror, and the very real threat of Iran’s nuclear breakout,” he said in a speech at the White House.

“In the event we are not able to reach a solution working with Congress and our allies, then the agreement will be terminated. It is under continuous review, and our participation can be canceled by me, as president, at any time.”

It remains to be seen what will come to pass over this now decertified deal, but as it currently stands President Trump has put it on notice.  He’s got his hands full with North Korea right now.

In regard to North Korea, President Trump is pushing forward strengthening ties with South Korea, Japan, China, Vietnam and the Phillipines. Considering the acts of aggression the NORKs have indulged in over the years - and gotten away with, to say nothing of their ongoing violent threats, dealing with the Kim regime as a world menace is long overdue.  President Clinton, President Bush and President Obama all failed in action to stop this sore from festering. If anything highlighted their dismal failure in a very pertinent way it was the cruel torture and death of American student, Otto Warmbier. This was Kim Jong Un giving the finger to President Obama - with both of his chubby little hands.  Obama did nothing, of course.. repairing to his cowardly default position of 'strategic patience.'

It is now up to President Trump to bring this menace to a head; peace is preferable, but I have no doubt that he will act militarily rather than allow Kim Jong Un to acquire the ballistic/nuclear capability  he seeks to be able to hit the American homeland. If people think this little bastard, Rocket Man, is difficult to deal with now, imagine how utterly impossible he will be if he acquires the capability he is so close to having.  Whether Trump likes it or not, he has to clean up after the toxic mess his predecessors left him.  He is not shrinking from that immense challenge but rather tackling it head-on.

These issues are colossal, civilisation-threatening problems, that’s why they’re on my list of measuring President Trump’s efficacy - they’re not only hard things to deal with, they’re nigh impossible in today’s cynical post-modern climate.  America doesn't have to act to benefit the rest of the world, President Trump would be well within his rights to act only for America. So, to the naysayers out there (and they are plenteous in every country) who keep parroting that President Trump has achieved nothing in his first year just because he failed to repeal Obamacare, I say they need to lift their thinking a little higher than their backsides and stop sounding like a Monty Python comedy:

“What has President Trump ever done for us?! 
Okay, okay… but apart from crippling ISIS, stopping Syrian chemical weapons attacks, rebooting the economy, lowering unemployment levels, decertifying the shonky Iranian deal, decreasing illegal immigration and tackling the North Korean nuclear menace - what has President Trump ever done for us?!!”
​

​If you enjoyed this article, please buy my book "Western Values Defended - a primer"


​