This website uses marketing and tracking technologies. Opting out of this will opt you out of all cookies, except for those needed to run the website. Note that some products may not work as well without tracking cookies.
Opt Out of CookiesThis website uses marketing and tracking technologies. Opting out of this will opt you out of all cookies, except for those needed to run the website. Note that some products may not work as well without tracking cookies.
Opt Out of Cookies
By Olivia Pierson First published on Insight@theBFD 19/11/2020 What we’re currently witnessing in the media is the raw stuff of dystopian nightmares – only, it’s real. In the last two weeks alone we’ve seen a tsunami of social media censorship. Any story about allegations of voter fraud in the recent U.S election are automatically flagged with a warning label and a clickable link diverting viewers through to an “official” explanation of the topic. Hence Twitter’s flag reads: “This claim about election fraud is disputed.” The link then lands you on a headline reading: “Voter fraud of any kind is exceedingly rare in the US, election experts confirm.” This biased and coordinated assault against one side of an important narrative is ubiquitous on Twitter – and Facebook. 340 million people use Twitter; 2.60 billion people use Facebook. That’s quite some worldwide reach. Mainstream media has fallen into lockstep too. In New Zealand alone, any Google offerings for news articles about the U.S. are 99.9% hateful toward President Trump and 99.9% favourable toward former President Obama, and the current, disputed “President Elect,” Joe Biden. Kiwis are simply spoon-fed news every day which our government-bailed-out media chooses to shove in their faces. Almost no conservative papers or outlets are filtered through to the Google newsfeed; the entirety of the outlook is left-wing propaganda. Last week, after I commented on our new Foreign Minister’s facial tattoo it resulted in some baying for my blood in the most uncivilised manner, and also some demanding the modern-day equivalent of a book-burning of my concise, historical primer: “Western Values Defended.” Mighty Ape dropped it like an infected bat because the Woke-fascists self-righteously demanded that they must. Olivia is a “racist,” they squawked. Yawn. I weep only for their lack of imagination, because we’re used to this now. However, so long as we still have citizen governments with ministers who are well paid by our hard-earned tax dollars, I’ll continue to say whatever I goddamn please about any appointee to a government role. Over the weekend, talented Australian celebrity chef, Pete Evans, tweeted out a cartoon meme, only to end up receiving similar virtual book-burning treatment. The sacred-cow he poked? A cartoon Black Lives Matter butterfly with a cartoon neo-Nazi black sun pattern in its cartoon wings. The Woke-fascists freaked out again, for that’s all they have – fascists and freaks. Never mind that BLM and ANTIFA activists, who work in tandem, act exactly like little bastard Brownshirts killing cops and beating conservative voters, smashing the businesses of decent hard-working Americans (Kristallnacht anybody?), vandalising historical statues, shooting fire-works at outside restaurant diners – to say nothing of demanding ritualistic, online book-burnings all the time. Not acting like Nazis at all, huh. If the helmet fits… Yesterday, Abigail Shrier, author of Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters, a critical analysis on the gender transition fashion of teenage girls wanting to become boys, had the book dropped by massive U.S retailer Target. Shrier claims that Target dropped the book after two anonymous tweets were sent to them, declaring the book to be “transphobic.” As a glowing example of the Streisand Effect, Shrier’s book sales went supernova – and she became an overnight best-selling author. Target have now reinstated the book. The mental garbage-dump inside the heads of people who think that they have influence without being in possession of anything close to a live-and-let-live, civilised mind is the great hoax of our time. Speaking of this type of influencer, the smooth-talking former-president Barrack Obama has just appeared in an interview where he encourages a stronger alliance between the big tech companies: Google, YouTube, Twitter and Facebook and all the mainstream media channels: NBC, CBS, MSNBC, CNBC, CNN, ABC, the BBC, Al Jazeera and the latest addition to Wokedom, Fox News, in order to distinguish “truth from fiction” across broadcasting: “I think we’re going to have to work with the media and with the tech… to bolster the standards that ensure we can separate truth from fiction,” Obama said to CBS News. Consider what Obama is actually saying. He’s talking about organised, near-total, tech and media blackouts in favour of the Left-wing perspective. That’s diabolically dystopian. The former-president said this only one day before Twitter and Facebook CEOs, Jack Dorsey and Mark Zuckerberg respectively, were again due to testify in a Senate Judicial Committee hearing about their ongoing censorship of conservative voices on their “content providing” platforms. Senator Ted Cruz took Dorsey to task: T.C: “Does voter fraud exist?” J.D: “I don’t know for certain.” T.C: “Are you an expert on voter fraud?” J.D. “No, I’m not.” T.C: “Well, why, then, is Twitter right now putting purported warnings on virtually any statement about voter fraud?” J.D: “We’re simply linking to a broader conversation so that people have more information.” T.C: “No, you’re not. You put up a page that says, ‘Voter fraud of any kind is exceedingly rare in the United States.’ That’s not linking to a broader conversation. That’s taking a disputed policy position, and you’re a publisher when you’re doing that.” This is conniving censorship to stop the one and only current president, Trump (at least until January), from demanding his constitutional right to investigate brazenly shonky election algorithms in voting machine software, electronically flipped votes, secret vote counts, chronic ballot-harvesting, dumped ballots and so many dead people rising from their graves to vote. On November 11th, spokeswoman for the Republican National Committee, Ronna McDaniel, declared that they already have 500 sworn, personal affidavits alleging 11,000 incidents of various types of voter fraud, only two weeks after a major election. These individual citizens and whistleblowers are standing by their statements upon the pain of perjury if they’re shown to be lying. Meanwhile, the official narrative coming out of nearly all media outlets is that there is "no evidence" because the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency has declared in a statement that: “There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.” 500 sworn affidavits alleging thousands of incidents of voter fraud ARE evidence. Get with it. Formidable American attorney, Sidney Powell, has stated that millions of votes were flipped on election night from Trump to Biden in the Dominion voting machines, across many states. She’s not exactly a woman known to pull BS out of a hat. Powell claims that she already has the evidence to prove it. For any unity to happen in America at this critical juncture, voter fraud allegations and individual testimonies must be heard by the U.S Supreme Court without delay. The Democrat tactic of repairing to “plausible deniability” may not work for them this time. Just let right be done, then everybody has to take the consequences. If right is not allowed to be done, then the Kafkaesque nightmare will only grow darker. If you enjoyed this article, please buy my book "Western Values Defended: A Primer”
4 Comments
By Olivia Pierson
First published on Insight@theBFD 12/11/2020 Back in August of this year, I remember reading a lot of political narratives which were nothing less than orchestrated gas-lighting projects with a view toward the coming November election. A great example is this piece in The Daily Beast, where political editor, Sam Stein, tried to make the case in September that if Trump lost the election, his supporters would take to the streets and organise mass, violent protests. This narrative had its roots in the Fight Back Table, a bunch of left-wing organisations which came together after 2016, then morphed into the Democracy Defense Nerve Centre after COVID-19 became a perceived weapon of controlling the behaviour of voters. Stein writes: “Over the course of two hours, participants broached the question of what the progressive political ecosystem can functionally do in a series of election scenarios. They began charting out what it would take to stand up a multi-state communications arm to fight disinformation, a training program for nonviolent civil disobedience, and the underpinnings of what one official described as ‘mass public unrest.’ And they pored over a report from the Transition Integrity Project, a bipartisan group formed in 2019, that analyzed various election-season scenarios and made clear the type of ratfuckery, corruption, and chaos that potentially was ahead. ‘The potential for violent conflict is high.’” Yet, unlike Black Lives Matter protests, and along with their good pals ANTIFA, thousands of Republican protesters have actually come together in multiple states under the banner of “Stop the Steal”, a name referring to the current election fraud, which keeps getting greater traction since the weird and obvious anomalies which took place on election night — from back-stamped ballots to a “glitch” in voting machines and even dead people voting for Biden. But no violence has taken place, not a shred: no looting, smashing businesses, statue toppling or shooting to kill the other side. Facebook and Twitter censored the ads for all “Stop the Steal” protests. That ghastly woman, Crooked, AKA Hillary Clinton, advised Biden back in August to: “Not concede under any circumstances because I think this is going to drag out, and eventually, I do believe he will win if we don’t give an inch and if we are as focused and relentless as the other side is.” Clinton knew it would “drag out” because she, along with the Democrat party, knew Trump was set for a victory and the only way Democrats could win would be through mail-in ballots and voter fraud on a scale never seen before. She was predicting a predictable response to an out-and-out election steal. Hence, the Swamp narrative has been consistently preaching how terrible it is for Trump to not concede the election after voter fraud has now been ubiquitously reported. This is pure gas-lighting, an effort to control the narrative and project enough political and media complicity in that narrative so as to safely call “nuts” to anyone who may agree with the President when he declares that the election has been stolen from the people. Stein claims that a “22-page document—which Brooks summarised in The Washington Post and which was obtained by The Daily Beast—described four simulation exercises: a clear Biden win, a narrow Biden win, a murky result, and a Trump Electoral College win with popular vote loss. Those simulations were played out with 67 prominent public officials and academics role-playing on seven teams: the Trump campaign, the Biden campaign, Republican elected officials, Democratic elected officials, career federal government employees, the media, and the public.” Stein continues: “Below the surface, it was even more harrowing. In the simulations, the Trump campaign was ‘consistently more ruthless than Team Biden,’ the authors wrote. The options that Team Trump had to use or misuse included manipulating classified information, selectively releasing ‘classified documents for political purposes, fueling manufactured rumors,’ freezing ‘assets of individuals and groups the president determines to be a threat,’ and restricting ‘internet communications in the name of national security.’ In these absurd “simulations,” President Trump was going to restrict internet communications. Huh? This is what the Democrats planned to do all along. We watched the voter suppression be conducted by the ridiculous polling which gave Biden an absolute landslide in their false projections. Then on election night, those of us who went to Twitter to see what the President may have to say about the bloody weird suspended vote counting were confronted with his tweets being censored by Jack Dorsey and his cronies – as they still are now every day in this election’s aftermath. YouTube are busy pulling down video clips of people who credibly claim that voter fraud is in play. Judge Jeanine Pirro, of Fox News, who happens to have once been a New York State Judge, had her popular Sunday show “suspended” on the weekend because she had a heated row with Fox Corporate about the President being censored and lied about on the so-called Trump-friendly network which employs her. Neil Cavuto of Fox News also cut away from Whitehouse Press Secretary, Kayleigh McEnany, when she firmly talked about bringing maximum transparency to all the voter fraud being reported. There is only one view being censored by the internet and other powerful media right now: that is the president’s, and his supporters’ perspective. Stein goes on in his September rant: “In some simulations, the Trump team succeeded in invoking the Insurrection Act and sending active duty military troops into U.S. cities to ‘restore order,’ ‘protect’ voting places, or confiscate ‘fraudulent’ ballots.” In others, the team ‘had Attorney General Bill Barr order the seizure of mail-in ballots to ensure that vote counting would stop.’” Stein knows how the system works — and so does this cabal of Leftists who formed a coalition to steal an election. Bill Barr is the Attorney General; if there are serious voter fraud allegations, he must allow them to be investigated under Federal Law. His duty is to the Constitution first, second and last, therefore to the American public. Supreme Court Justice Alito has already ordered Pennsylvania to separate out ballots that came in after 8pm election night, as the law stipulates. Whistleblowers are claiming that they were ordered to back-date ballots which were delivered with no post-mark to read “3rd November 2020.” If Barr failed to uphold serious investigations into these claims, he would be appallingly negligent in his duty as the country’s top attorney. Stein, the Democrats, the corrupt, partisan media-machine and Big Tech are conspiring powerfully to pull off a coup to deliver the White House into the hands of Joe Biden — which really means into the hands of the hopeful VP, Kamala Harris. If this is an empty conspiracy theory, as many are desperately claiming, then watch to see whether Democrats openly and vociferously welcome sunlight and transparency to scrutinise all the contested votes. If they don’t, and they certainly haven’t so far, you know it’s not just a theory but an actual conspiracy to steal the 2020 election from President Trump and his 72 million supporters. If you enjoyed this article, please buy my book "Western Values Defended: A Primer” |
Post Archives
July 2023
Links to Other Blogs |