Emails republished with permission. 

These four emails were sent to the following NZ news outlets, with not a single response forthcoming:

reporters@theguardian.co.nz, 
news@bayofplentytimes.co.nz, 
reporter@press.co.nz, 
news@dompost.co.nz, 
editorial@gisborneherald.co.nz, 
editor@greystar.co.nz, 
news@hbtoday.co.nz, 
news@hos.co.nz, 
newsdesk@nzherald.co.nz

Email 1:
July 19th, 2021

To whom it may concern,

I happened upon the lecture below after a visit to the VAERS website in the US.
My mother is due for her Covid vaccine and I thought a little informed consent would not  go amiss.

Having noticed that in the US the reporting on the above website indicates over 11,000 deaths and 400,000 adverse events [at the time of writing this] caused by the Covid vaccine, I dug a little deeper.

As a result of my searches I uncovered this lecture:

I don't wish to lecture anyone so I am respectfully requesting that someone in your newsroom view this information.

I am neither a conspiracy theorist nor a tin foil hat wearing loon, so compelling was this exposition on the history of COVID-19 and the development of the vaccine that I watched the whole 4 hours in a single sitting.

I have never been so disturbed by anything in my 60 years of life.

I can't even be certain that I believed what I was hearing, but I am compelled by conscience to forward to you this information in the hope that someone better equipped than myself can research these claims.

I have only one expectation, that someone come back to me to allay my fears as I did not sleep well last night and will not sleep well until someone comes back to me and refutes in an intelligent and articulate manner the claims contained in the above link.

I respectfully await your response.

Regards,
Eddie Paunovic
---

Email 2:
July 22, 2021
​
To whom it may concern,

Curiosity, it seems is not an attribute of our media.

I wonder if this has anything to do with our government's subsidies to our media organisations.

When the rest of us are having to maintain our livelihoods under the onslaught of Lockdowns and a regulatory environment Stalin would be proud of, YOU the media are silent!

While hundreds of thousands of New Zealanders line up to receive a jab of god knows what, terrified into submission and compliance by demagoguery, YOU the media are silent.

New Zealanders, good people, lining up to receive an experimental gene therapy without any informed consent.

What are the medium and long  term consequences of receiving this jab?

How does it work?

Does the Emergency Use order protect Governments and Big Pharma from prosecution given the magnitude of their CRIMES?

Why are so many dying or having serious reactions to this treatment?

Why in Israel and the UK are 88% and 60% of new COVID-19 cases double jabbed victims?

Why is there so much advertising on the radio exhorting New Zealanders blindly to the jab?

Soft, caring, feminine voices coercing our young and old to protect themselves against a scourge so virulent and dangerous that 99.7% of people under 75 years of age survive?

WHY ARE YOU SILENT?

Eddie Paunovic
---


Email 3:
August 3rd, 2021

To Whom it May Concern,

Please review the information contained in the link below [the Centre for Research on Globalisation website]
Covid-19 Vaccines Lead to New Infections and Mortality: The Evidence is Overwhelming

Eddie Paunovic
---

Email 4:
August 27th, 2021

To Whom it May Concern,

Israel has the largest number of COVID-19 cases per million population of any country in the world. 

Israel is also the most vaccinated county on the planet.
How can this be?

Our media organisations, rather than acting as a bull horn, parroting the dictates of our messianic leader and the shrieks of the blue-and-pink-haired ghouls of woke culture, ought to be challenging and applying journalistic rigour to the tyrannical actions of this  dictatorship.

The powerful coercions emanating from the ministry of truth to vaccinate at all costs supported by our criminally negligent media will see a high percentage of trusting NZers from the age of 12 up, injected with an active biological agent, with no clinical understanding of the consequences.

The suppression of well known and proven nutritional and pharmaceutical therapies by our government, media and social media corporations is a crime that will not be forgotten.

I recently visited my doctor, having read many clinical studies on proven prophylactics in the treatment of Covid 19, only to be told that he was under an order from the government not to supply these cheap and effective options.

The censorship of dissenting opinions and debate from professionals in the fields of immunology, epidemiology and medicine is anathema to the concept of informed consent.

How is it that the most vaccinated countries in the world have the worst contagion, the highest rates of hospitalisations and will soon have countless deaths? 

All of these double vaccinated people!!

What is the cause of the moral and intellectual atrophy of our political institutions and the blind ineffectual compliance of our media organisations?

There is overwhelming proof that the vaccines have caused harm to millions and in thousands of instances death.
 
Now it is becoming clear to anyone that cares to look that these biological agents increase the amount of contagion in the nasal cavity and render the vaccinated individual a super-spreader.

This is why heavy vaccination regimes are followed by massive surges of Delta infection, one is predicated of the other.

[*]Attached is a preliminary study produced by Oxford University and published in Lancet magazine.

I'm sure I will not receive a response nor do I expect that anyone in our media has the spleen, nor the concentration, to assimilate such a study.

Know this, the sins of omission on the part of our media institutions, even if in the service of a noble lie, will forever be a stain on our national character.

Regards,

Eddie Paunovic

* [Findings: Between 11th–25th June 2021 (week 7–8 after dose 2), 69 healthcare workers were tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. 62 participated in the clinical study. 49 were (pre)symptomatic with one requiring oxygen supplementation. All recovered uneventfully. 23 complete-genome sequences were obtained. They all belonged to the Delta variant, and were phylogenetically distinct from the contemporary Delta variant sequences obtained from community transmission cases, suggestive of ongoing transmission between the workers. Viral loads of breakthrough Delta variant infection cases were 251 times higher than those of cases infected with old strains detected between March-April 2020. Time from diagnosis to PCR negative was 8–33 days (median: 21). Neutralizing antibody levels after vaccination and at diagnosis of the cases were lower than those in the matched uninfected controls. There was no correlation between vaccine-induced neutralizing antibody levels and viral loads or the development of symptoms.

Interpretation: Breakthrough Delta variant infections are associated with high viral loads, prolonged PCR positivity, and low levels of vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies, explaining the transmission between the vaccinated people. Physical distancing measures remain critical to reduce SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant transmission.]

---

The incurious groupthink and one-sided push by NZ’s media to see our whole population injected with experimental vaccines, regardless of other scientific views expressed and studied during this time, is utterly unconscionable and makes them complicit in the results of this unethically hysterical over-reaction.

By Olivia Pierson

Back in February of this year, a very long list of doctors and scientists in Europe put their signatures on an open letter to the European Medicines Agency highlighting their concerns about the safety of mass vaccinations for the Covid-19 virus.  They cc'd in Charles Michel, President of the Council of Europe and Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission.

Their letter particularly addressed the oft’ played down side effects:

We note that a wide range of side effects is being reported following vaccination of previously healthy younger individuals with the gene-based COVID-19 vaccines. Moreover, there have been numerous media reports from around the world of care homes being struck by COVID-19 within days of vaccination of residents. While we recognise that these occurrences might, every one of them, have been unfortunate coincidences, we are concerned that there has been and there continues to be inadequate scrutiny of the possible causes of illness or death under these circumstances, and especially so in the absence of post-mortems examinations.

After asking for evidence to be given for 7 key issues, their letter ends with these words:

There are serious concerns, including but not confined to those outlined above, that the approval of the COVID-19 vaccines by the EMA was premature and reckless, and that the administration of the vaccines constituted and still does constitute “human experimentation”, which was and still is in violation of the Nuremberg Code.
In view of the urgency of the situation, we request that you reply to this email within seven days and address all our concerns substantively. Should you choose not to comply with this reasonable request, we will make this letter public.

I gather that a response was not forthcoming.
​
In May, prominent French virologist and Nobel Laureate, Professor Luc Montagnier (who discovered the HIV virus) warned in an interview that due to Antibody-dependent Enhancement (ADE) the vaccinations were creating the variants.

Montagnier said, “Mass vaccinations are a 'scientific error as well as a medical error, it is an unacceptable mistake. The history books will show that, because it is the vaccination that is creating the variants. There are antibodies, created by the vaccine, forcing the virus to 'find another solution' or die. This is where the variants are created. It is the variants that 'are a production and result from the vaccination.’” 

On March 6th, 2021, Belgian Geert Vanden Bossche, who is a veterinarian, with a PhD in virology along with being a vaccine development expert, wrote a letter to the World Health Organisation calling for the halt of worldwide mass vaccination programmes with a warning that "mass vaccination amidst a pandemic creates an irrepressible monster.”

I reproduce his letter in its entirety beneath: 
[I took the great liberty of correcting his spelling since English is not his first language.]

Geert Vanden Bossche, DMV, PhD, independent virologist and vaccine expert, formerly employed at GAVI and The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

To all authorities scientists and experts around the world, to whom this concerns: the entire world population.

I am all but an anti-vaxxer. As a scientist I do not usually appeal to any platform of this kind to make a stand on vaccine-related topics. As a dedicated virologist and vaccine expert I only make an exception when health authorities allow vaccines to be administered in ways that threaten public health, most certainly when scientific evidence is being ignored. The present extremely critcal situaton forces me to spread this emergency call. As the unprecedented extent of human intervention in the Covid-19- pandemic is now at risk of resulting in a global catastrophe without equal, this call cannot sound loudly and strongly enough.

As stated, I am not against vaccination.  On the contrary, I can assure you that each of the current vaccines have been designed, developed and manufactured by brilliant and competent scientists. However, this type of prophylactic vaccines are completely inappropriate, and even highly dangerous, when used in mass vaccination campaigns during a viral pandemic. Vaccinologists, scientists and clinicians are blinded by the positive short-term effects in individual patents, but don’t seem to bother about the disastrous consequences for global health. Unless I am scientifically proven wrong, it is difficult to understand how current human interventions will prevent circulating variants from turning into a wild monster.

Racing against the clock, I am completing my scientific manuscript, the publication of which is, unfortunately, likely to come too late given the ever increasing threat from rapidly spreading, highly infectious variants. This is why I decided to already post a summary of my findings as well as my keynote speech at the recent Vaccine Summit in Ohio on LinkedIn.  Last Monday, I provided international health organisations  including the WHO, with my analysis of the current pandemic as based on scientifically informed insights in the immune biology of Covid-19. Given the level of emergency, I urged them to consider my concerns and to initiate a debate on the detrimental consequences of further ‘viral immune escape’. For those who are no experts in this field  I am attaching below a more accessible and comprehensible version of the science behind this insidious phenomenon.

While there is no time to spare, I have not received any feedback thus far. Experts and politicians have remained silent while obviously still eager to talk about relaxing infection prevention rules and 'springtime freedom'. My statements are based on nothing else but science. They shall only be contradicted by science. While one can barely make any incorrect scientific statements without being criticised by peers, it seems like the elite of scientists who are currently advising our world leaders prefer to stay silent. Sufficient scientific evidence has been brought to the table. Unfortunately, it remains untouched by those who have the power to act. How long can one ignore the problem when there is at present massive evidence that viral immune escape is now threatening humanity? We can hardly say we didn't know - or were not warned.

​In this agonising letter I put all of my reputation and credibility at stake. I expect from you, guardians of mankind, at least the same. It is of utmost urgency. Do open the debate. By all means: turn the tide!  

PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY OF INTERNATIONAL CONCERN
Why mass vaccination amidst a pandemic creates an irrepressible monster

The key question is: why does nobody seem to bother about viral immune escape? Let me try to explain this by means of a more easily understood phenomenon: Antimicrobial resistance.  One can easily extrapolate this scourge to resistance to our self-made ‘antiviral antibiotics.' Indeed, antibodies (Abs) produced by our own immune system can be considered self-made antiviral antibiotics  regardless of whether they are part of our innate immune system (so-called ‘natural' Abs) or elicited in response to specific pathogens (resulting in so-called ‘acquired’ Abs).  Natural Abs are not germ-specific whereas acquired Abs are specifically directed at the invading pathogen. At birth, our innate immune system is ‘inexperienced’ but well-established.  It protects us from a multitude of pathogens, thereby preventing these pathogens from causing disease. As the innate immune system cannot remember the pathogens it encountered (innate immunity has no so-called ‘immunological memory’), we can only continue to rely on it provided we keep it ‘trained’ well enough. Training is achieved by regular exposure to a myriad of environmental agents, including pathogens. However, as we age, we will increasingly face situations where our innate immunity (often called ‘the first line of immune defense’) is not strong enough to halt the pathogen at the portal of entry (mostly mucosal barriers like respiratory or intestinal epithelia).  When this happens, the immune system has to rely on more specialised effectors of our immune system (i.e., antigen-specific Abs and T cells) to fight the pathogen.  So, as we grow up, we increasingly mount pathogen-specific immunity, including highly specific Abs. As those have stronger affinity for the pathogen (e.g., virus) and can reach high concentrations they can quite easily outcompete our natural Abs for binding to the pathogen/virus.  It is precisely this type of highly specific  high affinity Abs that current Covid-19 vaccines are inducing.  Of course, the noble purpose of these Abs is to protect us against Covid-19.  So, why then should there be a major concern using these vaccines to fight Covid-19?

Well, similar to the rules applying to classical antimicrobial antibiotics it is paramount that our self-made ‘antiviral antibiotics' are made available in sufficient concentration and are tailored at the specific features of our enemy.  This is why in case of bacterial disease it is critical to not only chose the right type of antibiotic (based on the results from an antibiogram) but to also take the antibiotic for long enough (according to the prescription). Failure to comply with these requirements is at risk of grantng microbes a chance to survive and hence, may cause the disease to flare up.  A very similar mechanism may also apply to viruses, especially to viruses that can easily and rapidly mutate (which is, for example, the case with Coronaviruses); when the pressure exerted by the army’s (read: population’s immune defense) starts to threaten viral replication and transmission, the virus will take on another coat so that it can no longer be easily recognised and, therefore, attacked by the host immune system. The virus is now able to escape immunity (so-called: ‘immune escape’).  However, the virus can only rely on this strategy provided it still has room enough to replicate.  Viruses, in contrast to the majority of bacteria, must rely on living host cells to replicate. This is why the occurrence of ‘escape mutants’ isn’t too worrisome as long as the likelihood for these variants to rapidly find another host is quite remote. However, that’s not particularly the case during a viral pandemic! During a pandemic, the virus is spreading all over the globe with many subjects shedding and transmitting the virus (even including asymptomatic ‘carriers’). The higher the viral load, the higher the likelihood for the virus to bump into subjects who haven’t been infected yet or who were infected but didn’t develop symptoms. Unless they are sufficiently protected by their innate immune defense (through natural Abs), they will catch Covid-19 disease as they cannot rely on other, i.e., acquired Abs.

It has been extensively reported, indeed, that the increase in S (spike)-specific Abs in asymptomatically infected people is rather limited and only short-lived. Furthermore, these Abs have not achieved full maturity.  The combination of viral infection on a background of suboptimal Ab maturity and concentration enables the virus to select mutations allowing it to escape the immune pressure.  The selection of those mutations preferably occurs in the S protein as this is the viral protein that is responsible for viral infectiousness.  As the selected mutations endow the virus with increased infectious capacity, it now becomes much easier for the virus to cause severe disease in infected subjects.  The more people develop symptomatic disease, the better the virus can secure its propagation and perpetuation (people who get severe disease will shed more virus and for a longer period of time than asymptomatically infected subjects do).  Unfortunately enough, the short-lived rise in S-specific Abs does, however, suffice to bypass people’s innate/natural Ab.  Those are put out of business as their affinity for S is lower than the affinity of S-specific Abs.  This is to say that with an increasing rate of infection in the population the number of subjects who get infected while experiencing a momentary increase in Specific Abs will steadily increase.  Consequently, the number of subjects who get infected while experiencing a momentary decrease in their innate immunity will increase.  As a result, a steadily increasing number of subjects will become more susceptible to getting severe disease instead of showing only mild symptoms (i.e., limited to the upper respiratory tract) or no symptoms at all.  During a pandemic, especially youngsters will be affected by this evolution as their natural Abs are not yet largely suppressed by a panoply of ‘acquired’, antigen-specific Abs.  Natural Abs, and natural immunity in general, play a critical role in protecting us from pathogens as they constitute our first line of immune defense.  In contrast to acquired immunity, innate immune responses protect against a large spectrum of pathogens (so don’t compromise or sacrifice your innate immune defense!). Because natural Abs and innate immune cells recognise a diversified spectrum of foreign (i.e., non-self) agents (only some of which have pathogenic potential), it’s important, indeed, to keep it sufficiently exposed to environmental challenges.  By keeping the innate immune system (which, unfortunately, has no memory!) TRAINED, we can much more easily resist germs which have real pathogenic potential.  It has, for example, been reported and scientifically proven that exposure to other, quite harmless Coronaviruses causing a ‘common cold ’ can provide protection although short-lived, against Covid-19 and its loyal henchmen (i.e., the more infectious variants).

​Suppression of innate immunity, especially in the younger age groups, can, therefore, become very problematic.  There can be no doubt that lack of exposure due to stringent containment measures implemented as of the beginning of the pandemic has not been beneficial to keeping people’s innate immune system well trained.  As if this was not already heavily compromising innate immune defense in this population segment, there comes yet another force into play that will dramatically enhance morbidity and mortality rates in the younger age groups: MASS VACCINATION of the ELDERLY.  The more extensively the latter age group will be vaccinated and hence, protected, the more the virus is forced to continue causing disease in younger age groups. This is only going to be possible provided it escapes to the S-specific Abs that are momentarily raised in previously asymptomatically infected subjects.  If the virus manages to do so, it can benefit from the (momentarily) suppressed innate immunity, thereby causing disease in an increasing number of these subjects and ensuring its own propagation.  Selecting targeted mutations in the S protein is, therefore, the way to go in order for the virus to enhance its infectiousness in candidates that are prone to getting the disease because of a transient weakness of their innate immune defense.

​But in the meantime we’re also facing a huge problem in vaccinated people as they’re now more and more confronted with infectious variants displaying a type of S protein that is increasingly different from the S edition comprised within the vaccine (the later edition originates from the original, much less infectious strain at the beginning of the pandemic). The more variants become infectious (i.e., as a result of blocking access of the virus to the vaccinated segment of the population), the less vaccinal Abs will protect.  Already now, lack of protection is leading to viral shedding and transmission in vaccine recipients who are exposed to these more infectious strains (which, by the way, increasingly dominate the field).  This is how we are currently turning vaccinees into asymptomatic carriers shedding infectious variants.

At some point, in a likely very near future, it’s going to become more profitable (in terms of ‘return on selection investment’) for the virus to just add another few mutations (maybe just one or two) to the S protein of viral variants (already endowed with multiple mutations enhancing infectiousness in an attempt to further strengthen its binding to the receptor (ACE-2) expressed on the surface of permissive epithelial cells. This will now allow the new variant to outcompete vaccinal Abs for binding to the ACE receptor. This is to say that at this stage, it would only take very few additional targeted mutations within the viral receptor-binding domain to fully resist S-specific anti-Covid-19 Abs, regardless whether the latter are elicited by the vaccine or by natural infection.  At that stage, the virus will, indeed, have managed to gain access to a huge reservoir of subjects who have now become highly susceptible to disease as their S-specific Abs have now become useless in terms of protection but still manage to provide for long-lived suppression of their innate immunity (i.e., natural infection  and especially vaccination elicit relatively long-lived specific Ab titers). The susceptible reservoir comprises both, vaccinated people and those who’re left with sufficient S-specific Abs due to previous Covid-19 disease).  So, MISSION ACCOMPLISHED for Covid-19 but a DISASTROUS SITUATION for all vaccinated subjects and Covid-19 seropositive people as they’ve now lost both, their acquired and innate immune defense against Covid-19 (while highly infectious strains are circulating).  That’s ‘one small step for the virus, one giant catastrophe for mankind’, which is to say that we’ll have whipped up the virus in the younger population up to a level that it now takes little effort for Covid-19 to transform into a highly infectious virus that completely ignores both the innate arm of our immune system as well as the adaptive/acquired one (regardless of whether the acquired Abs resulted from vaccination or natural infection).  The effort for the virus is now becoming even more negligible given that many vaccine recipients are now exposed to highly infectious viral variants while having received only a single shot of the vaccine. Hence, they are endowed with Abs that have not yet acquired optimal functionality  There is no need to explain that this is just going to further enhance immune escape. Basically, we’ll very soon be confronted with a super-infectious virus that completely resists our most precious defense mechanism: The human immune system.

From all of the above, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to imagine how the consequences of the extensive and erroneous human intervention in this pandemic are not going to wipe out large parts of our human population.  One could only think of very few other strategies to achieve the same level of efficiency in turning a relatively harmless virus into a bioweapon of mass destruction.

It’s certainly also worth mentioning that mutations in the S protein (i.e., exactly the same protein that is subject to selection of escape mutations are known to enable Coronaviruses to cross species barriers.  This is to say that the risk that vaccine-mediated immune escape could allow the virus to jump to other animal species, especially industrial livestock (e.g., pig and poultry farms), is not negligible.  These species are already known to host several different Coronaviruses and are usually housed in farms with high stocking density. Similar to the situation with influenza virus, these species could than serve as an additional reservoir for SARS-COVID-2 virus.  As pathogens have co-evolved with the host immune system, natural pandemics of acute self-limiting viral infections have been shaped such as to take a toll on human lives that is not higher than strictly required.  Due to human intervention  the course of this pandemic has been thoroughly disturbed as of the very beginning.  Widespread and stringent infection prevention measures combined with mass vaccination campaigns using inadequate vaccines will undoubtedly lead to a situation where the pandemic is getting increasingly ‘out of control’.

​Paradoxically, the only intervention that could offer a perspective to end this pandemic (other than to let it run its disastrous course) is …VACCINATION.   Of course, the type of vaccines to be used would be completely different from conventional vaccines in that they’re not inducing the usual suspects, i.e., B and T cells, but NK cells.  There is, indeed, compelling scientific evidence that these cells play a key role in facilitating complete elimination of Covid-19 at an early stage of infection in asymptomatically infected subjects.  NK cells are part of the cellular arm of our innate immune system and, alike natural Abs, they are capable of recognising and attacking a broad and diversified spectrum of pathogenic agents.  There is a sound scientific rationale to assume that it is possible to ‘prime’ NK cells in ways for them to recognise and kill Coronaviruses at large (include all their variants) at an early stage of infection.  NK cells have increasingly been described to be endowed with the capacity to acquire immunological memory. By educating these cells in ways that enable them to durably recognise and target Coronavirus-infected cells, our immune system could be perfectly armed for a targeted attack to the universe of Coronaviruses prior to exposure.  As NK cell-based immune defense provides sterilising immunity and allows for broad spectrum and fast protection it is reasonable to assume that harnessing our innate immune cells is going to be the only type of human intervention left to halt the dangerous spread of highly infectious Covid-19 variants.

​If we, human beings, are committed to perpetuating our species, we have no choice left but to eradicate these highly infectious viral variants. This will, indeed, require large vaccination campaigns. However, NK cell-based vaccines will primarily enable our natural immunity to be better prepared (memory!) and to induce herd immunity (which is exactly the opposite of what current Covid-19 vaccines do as those increasingly turn vaccine recipients into asymptomatic carriers who are shedding virus).  So, there is not one second left for gears to be switched and to replace the current killer vaccines by life-saving vaccines. I am appealing to the WHO and all stakeholders involved, no matter their conviction to immediately declare such action as THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY OF INTERNATIONAL CONCERN.

Author: Geert Vanden Bossche, DVM, PhD (March 6, 2021)


So mRNA vaccines, rolled out into the bodies of the masses of every nation do not stop infections of Covid-19, nor its spread, due to the virus mutating in order to escape the immune defences of both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. Instead we may see is its growth into a monster virus - a Frankenstein, way beyond the original strain that 99.9% of the world’s population had natural immunity to.

The CDC has put out an early release of a study which is scheduled for publication in the Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal come October.  It details a population of French Guiana gold miners in the Amazon forest, who fell victim to the Gamma variant of Covid-19, though none required hospitalisation.

Abstract
An outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 caused by the Gamma variant of concern infected 24/44 (55%) employees of a gold mine in French Guiana (87% symptomatic, no severe forms). The attack rate was 60% (15/25) among fully vaccinated miners and 75% (3/4) among unvaccinated miners without a history of infection.

The Study
The attack rate was 15/25 (60.0%) in fully vaccinated miners, 6/15 (40.0%) in those partially vaccinated or with a history of COVID-19, and 3/4 (75%) in those not vaccinated. Attack rate was 0/6 among persons with a previous history of COVID-19 versus 63.2% among those with no previous history.

mRNA vaccines such as BNT162b2 demonstrated high effectiveness both in clinical trials and in real-world situations against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 and its Alpha variant infections. However, other Variants Of Concern, such as Beta or Gamma, harbor mutations conferring potential escape from humoral response induced either by prior infection or vaccination...

Conclusion
The low Ct of positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2 despite prior vaccination suggested that a complete vaccination scheme with BNT162b2 vaccine was not sufficient to prevent symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and its transmission in this context of communal life...

In conclusion, we describe a VOC Gamma COVID-19 outbreak with a strikingly high attack rate among persons fully vaccinated with BNT162b2 vaccine [Pfizer-BioNTech]. Our observation suggested that BNT162b2 protected from severe COVID-19. However, this single unexpected outbreak in a small and isolated vaccinated population requires further real-life studies on BNT162b2 vaccine effectiveness against the VOC Gamma.

So, far from the constant media manipulation that the unvaccinated are a real time risk to populations acquiring herd immunity through vaccinations, it may just be that the real risk of a Frankensteinian monster virus could actually be coming from the vaccinated as the virus strives to live, which the unvaccinated and the healthy in younger populations will have no immunity against anymore - and neither will the vaccinated.

​

By Olivia Pierson

This is the script of Darryl Cooper's (@Martyrmade) analysis which was picked up and read aloud by Tucker Carlson below.
For an extended read on this issue from Darryl about his thinking without the truncation necessary to summarise on Twitter, go here. 

"I think I've had discussions w/enough Boomer-tier Trump supporters who believe the 2020 election was fraudulent to extract a general theory about their perspective. It is also the perspective of most of the people at the Capitol on 1/6, and probably even Trump himself. 

Most believe some or all of the theories involving midnight ballots, voting machines, etc, but what you find when you talk to them is that, while they'll defend those positions w/info they got from Hannity or Breitbart or whatever, they're not particularly attached to them. 

Here are the facts - actual, confirmed facts - that shape their perspective: 1) The FBI/etc spied on the 2016 Trump campaign using evidence manufactured by the Clinton campaign. We now know that all involved knew it was fake from Day 1 (see: Brennan's July 2016 memo, etc). 

These are Tea Party people. The types who give their kids a pocket Constitution for their birthday and have Founding Fathers memes in their bios. The intel community spying on a presidential campaign using fake evidence (incl forged documents) is a big deal to them. 

Everyone involved lied about their involvement as long as they could. We only learned the DNC paid for the manufactured evidence because of a court order. Comey denied on TV knowing the DNC paid for it, when we have emails from a year earlier proving that he knew. 

This was true with everyone, from CIA Dir Brennan & Adam Schiff - who were on TV saying they'd seen clear evidence of collusion w/Russia, while admitting under oath behind closed doors that they hadn't - all the way down the line. In the end we learned that it was ALL fake. 

At first, many Trump ppl were worried there must be some collusion, because every media & intel agency wouldn't make it up out of nothing. When it was clear that they had made it up, people expected a reckoning, and shed many illusions about their gov't when it didn't happen. 

We know as fact:
a) The Steele dossier was the sole evidence used to justify spying on the Trump campaign,
b) The FBI knew the Steele dossier was a DNC op,
c) Steele's source told the FBI the info was unserious,
d) they did not inform the court of any of this and kept spying. 

Trump supporters know the collusion case front and back. They went from worrying the collusion must be real, to suspecting it might be fake, to realizing it was a scam, then watched as every institution - agencies, the press, Congress, academia - gaslit them for another year. 

Worse, collusion was used to scare people away from working in the administration. They knew their entire lives would be investigated. Many quit because they were being bankrupted by legal fees. The DoJ, press, & gov't destroyed lives and actively subverted an elected admin. 

This is where people whose political identity was largely defined by a naive belief in what they learned in Civics class began to see the outline of a Regime that crossed all institutional boundaries. Because it had stepped out of the shadows to unite against an interloper. 

GOP propaganda still has many of them thinking in terms of partisan binaries, but A LOT of Trump supporters see that the Regime is not partisan. They all know that the same institutions would have taken opposite sides if it was a Tulsi Gabbard vs Jeb Bush election. 

It's hard to describe to people on the left (who are used to thinking of gov't as a conspiracy... Watergate, COINTELPRO, WMD, etc) how shocking & disillusioning this was for people who encourage their sons to enlist in the Army, and hate ppl who don't stand for the Anthem. 

They could have managed the shock if it only involved the government. But the behavior of the corporate press is really what radicalized them. They hate journalists more than they hate any politician or gov't official, because they feel most betrayed by them. 

The idea that the press is driven by ratings/sensationalism became untenable. If that were true, they'd be all over the Epstein story. The corporate press is the propaganda arm of the Regime they now see in outline. Nothing anyone says will ever make them unsee that, period. 

This is profoundly disorienting. Many of them don't know for certain whether ballots were faked in November 2020, but they know for absolute certain that the press, the FBI, etc would lie to them if there was. They have every reason to believe that, and it's probably true. 

They watched the press behave like animals for four years. Tens of millions of people will always see Kavanaugh as a gang rapist, based on nothing, because of CNN. And CNN seems proud of that. They led a lynch mob against a high school kid. They cheered on a summer of riots. 

They always claimed the media had liberal bias, fine, whatever. They still thought the press would admit truth if they were cornered. Now they don't. It's a different thing to watch them invent stories whole cloth in order to destroy regular lives and spark mass violence.
 
Time Mag told us that during the 2020 riots, there were weekly conference calls involving, among others, leaders of the protests, the local officials who refused to stop them, and media people who framed them for political effect. In Ukraine we call that a color revolution. 

Throughout the summer, Democrat governors took advantage of COVID to change voting procedures. It wasn't just the mail-ins (they lowered signature matching standards, etc). After the collusion scam, the fake impeachment, Trump ppl expected shenanigans by now. 

Re: "fake impeachment", we now know that Trump's request for Ukraine to cooperate w/the DOJ regarding Biden's $ activities in Ukraine was in support of an active investigation being pursued by the FBI and Ukraine AG at the time, and so a completely legitimate request. 

Then you get the Hunter laptop scandal. Big Tech ran a full-on censorship campaign against a major newspaper to protect a political candidate. Period. Everyone knows it, all of the Tech companies now admit it was a "mistake" - but, ya know, the election's over, so who cares?

Goes w/o saying, but: If the NY Times had Don Jr's laptop, full of pics of him smoking crack and engaging in group sex, lots of lurid family drama, emails describing direct corruption and backed up by the CEO of the company they were using, the NYT wouldn't have been banned. 

Think back: Stories about Trump being pissed on by Russian prostitutes and blackmailed by Putin were promoted as fact, and the only evidence was a document paid for by his opposition and disavowed by its source. The NY Post was banned for reporting on true information. 

The reaction of Trump ppl to all this was not, "no fair!" That's how they felt about Romney's "binders of women" in 2012. This is different. Now they see, correctly, that every institution is captured by ppl who will use any means to exclude them from the political process. 

And yet they showed up in record numbers to vote. He got 13m more votes than in 2016, 10m more than Clinton got! As election night dragged on, they allowed themselves some hope. But when the four critical swing states (and only those states) went dark at midnight, they knew. 

Over the ensuing weeks, they got shuffled around by grifters and media scam artists selling them conspiracy theories.*
They latched onto one, then another increasingly absurd theory as they tried to put a concrete name on something very real. 

Media & Tech did everything to make things worse. Everything about the election was strange - the changes to procedure, unprecedented mail-in voting, the delays, etc - but rather than admit that and make everything transparent, they banned discussion of it (even in DMs!). 

Everyone knows that, just as Don Jr's laptop would've been the story of the century, if everything about the election dispute was the same, except the parties were reversed, suspicions about the outcome would've been Taken Very Seriously. See 2016 for proof. 

Even the courts' refusal of the case gets nowhere w/them, because of how the opposition embraced mass political violence. They'll say, w/good reason: What judge will stick his neck out for Trump knowing he'll be destroyed in the media as a violent mob burns down his house? 

It's a fact, according to Time Magazine, that mass riots were planned in cities across the country if Trump won. Sure, they were "protests", but they were planned by the same people as during the summer, and everyone knows what it would have meant. Judges have families, too. 

Forget the ballot conspiracies. It's a fact that governors used COVID to unconstitutionally alter election procedures (the Constitution states that only legislatures can do so) to help Biden to make up for a massive enthusiasm gap by gaming the mail-in ballot system. 

They knew it was unconstitutional, it's right there in plain English. But they knew the cases wouldn't see court until after the election. And what judge will toss millions of ballots because a governor broke the rules? The threat of mass riots wasn't implied, it was direct. 

a) The entrenched bureaucracy & security state subverted Trump from Day 1,
b) The press is part of the operation,
c) Election rules were changed,
d) Big Tech censors opposition,
e) Political violence is legitimized & encouraged,
f) Trump is banned from social media. 

They were led down some rabbit holes, but they are absolutely right that their gov't is monopolized by a Regime that believes they are beneath representation, and will observe no limits to keep them getting it. Trump fans should be happy he lost; it might've kept him alive."
 
MartyrMade Fever dreams from the human storyhttps://martyrmade.com/
​• • •


* Olivia’s edit:
The so-called “conspiracy theories" put out by heroine Sidney Powell, Patrick Byrne, Jovan Pulitzer and General Michael Flynn etc are not “theories," there was an actual conspiracy to oust Trump also through voting machine fraud - and in time the truth of this will out.  Keep your eye on the Arizona audit!

Tucker Carlson picks up Darryl Cooper’s analysis:
​