This website uses marketing and tracking technologies. Opting out of this will opt you out of all cookies, except for those needed to run the website. Note that some products may not work as well without tracking cookies.
Opt Out of Cookies
An injured ANZAC with his mates
By Olivia Pierson The day of the year that I enjoy being with my fellow New Zealanders the most is ANZAC Day. For me it trumps Christmas, birthdays and everything in between because it unites us all together in a peaceful, respectful and sobering manner to pay homage to our many ancestors who fought to keep our beloved nation a part of the Free World. The words “lest we forget” bear a loaded meaning. It would be shameful to forget that our nation’s liberty and peace were bought with blood, honour and sacrifice. Those brave men who paid the price of a life cut short loved their country, their mothers and fathers, their women, their children and their mates. Whenever we come together to remember these fine men, whom most of us living now did not even know, we bond together in spiritual patriotism which quietly bespeaks our shared respect for each other’s people and our deep love for our country, our land, our home. This feeling between us claims us as allies in remembrance, just as our ancestors were allies in the fighting. We are the Dead. Short days ago We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow, Loved, and were loved, and now we lie In Flanders fields. Take up our quarrel with the foe To you from failing hands we throw The torch, be yours to hold it high If ye break faith with us who die We shall not sleep, though poppies grow In Flanders fields. Both the wars which claimed the lives of our Kiwi ancestors were started by Germany. In the days of World War I, after the July Crisis, Germany and Austria launched an attack on France through neutral Belgium. The British Empire came in to defend its French ally. In the days of World War II (an extension of WWI twenty years later), Germany invaded Poland. The British Empire came in to defend its Polish ally. That’s what an honourable ally does, pledges to defend its allies and means it. When any leader of a country enacts edicts and has legislation drawn up in order to block a group of natural and naturalised citizens from participating fully in their society, that leader is embracing fascism. To radically alter laws to exclude a group of people from society at the behest of a government - the most powerful repository of force - is a malicious act on that nation’s citizenry for which there are many historical precedents. The most obvious and close to us by the measure of years is of course Nazi fascism. The infamous 1935 Nuremberg Rally saw the announcement of new laws to begin the legal framework for separating out Jewish, Roma and Black citizens from ordinary German citizenship. These poor people had already been on the receiving end of thuggish violence and persecution since the Nazi party had been elected in ’33, but the Nuremberg laws pumped that persecution up on legalised steroids. All German Jews had their passports invalidated, then they had to apply for a new update - passports which reflected the freshly-minted new discrimination boundary with a big red stamp: “J” for Jude. Jewish businesses had been under boycotts since ’33, and Germans who continued to trade with them out of solidarity or friendship, or just good business sense, soon learned not to as they also learned not to visit doctors, lawyers and other professionals who were Jews. They could be arrested or shot for not discriminating as they were commanded to do. The rest is dark history and we know it to be evil, cruel and destructive beyond the imaginings of the ordinary people who lived through it - and those who didn’t. I have heard from various friends and family members that they are sick of “Nazi fascist” references in media because they’re overused insults thrown around with abandon to smear those with opposing political views. I get it. But now is not the time to let the gas-lighters who set false narratives up by misusing these smears malevolently in irrelevant contexts (such as the fools on CNN who digitally baptised President Trump as being “worse than Hitler, Stalin and Mao”) numb you to the fact that real fascism really is in the ascendant amongst us now. History and past experience are the best teachers known to man and we’d be ignorant idiots if we ignored their lessons when the parallels between events are quite glaring. Right now, concerning the unvaccinated-against-Covid-19 citizens of our country who not only are the current recipients of openly expressed, government-sanctioned ridicule and contempt, but are also persecuted through real threats to employment, to free trading, to socialising, to medical and dental treatment on the basis of not receiving an “updated passport” never before seen in our lifetimes; this is an open act of hostility upon us as free citizens. Where is the euphemistic “Team of 5 Million” now? Divided and hating on each other because of an experimental medical injection without the usual 2,5 & 7 year safety data, which our Bill of Rights states clearly we have the protected human right to refuse by virtue of being thinking, individual citizens and not dumb, collective livestock. NZBOR Act 1990: 11- “Right to refuse to undergo medical treatment” Everyone has the right to refuse to undergo any medical treatment. It is not a Bill of Hopes or a Bill of Wishes, nor is it a Bill of Maybes, it’s a Bill of Rights and it’s there to protect the civil and political rights of all New Zealanders. The hateful chasm now open between us has been wilfully engineered by manmade cunning, by people well-educated in how to rule. Divide and conquer is a way to sow division and hate, demoralise and takeover the lives of peaceable citizens who naturally tolerate different ways, thoughts, customs and individual choices. We may bitch at each other, or even insult each other’s pride with name calling and stereotypical insults, but at the end of most evenings, we leave each other on principle to live-and-let-live and at worst tell a sweary anecdote about it over a laugh with our friends. If the Nazis had just verbally ribbed and insulted the Jews during their time, we wouldn’t be talking about it now. No. The Nazis were utterly serious and fanatically set about altering all the laws to legislate Jews out of citizen protections. To do this the Nazis had to inflame hatred in the hearts of mostly Christian Germans (Catholics and Lutherans) by pretending that the Jews were an existential threat to their health and their economy - a living plague upon their houses. And it worked. How did it work so resoundingly? Simply because German civilians and military used the term: “I’m just following orders,” which is the mantra and raison d’être of the cowardly person. Right now in NZ we’re hearing businesses say, “Unvaccinated people don’t have a job, hey, we’re just following orders from the new regulations.” We’re watching our police say, “We’re just doing our job, we’re following orders,” when they tackle a Kiwi father to the ground in front of his young son outside a supermarket because Dad's not smothering himself with the equivalent of a bloody balaclava to do his shopping. We’re watching restaurants and venues issue new rules about barring unvaccinated people from being served on their premises, “We’re just following orders. It’s the rules - we have to keep all the compliant, sensible people safe from you lot.” Worst of all, we’re watching people be told that they’re a public threat to others if they don’t take this medical injection, “If you don’t follow orders too for the sake of the public good then you’re a bad person, a moral hazard to others - unclean, infected, dirty, selfish.” Disgustingly, I’ve seen many, many social media posts on Twitter and FaceBook saying that unvaccinated people should be dragged out of their homes and forced to have the injection against their will. They also make a lot of noise about the unvaxxed being denied medical treatment if they do contract Covid-19. This is the orchestrated hate working. If New Zealanders have not yet tumbled to the realisation that what we are watching unfold is spectacularly sinister, then we’re in deep shit and we’ve already lost the spirit of our ANZAC camaraderie, in fact it’s worse than that for it means what we’ve lost is nothing less than the Free World itself. But here’s a small sliver of hope. European, Maori, Pacific Islanders, Africans, Middle Easterners, Indians and Asians are finding solidarity with each other over this enforced, sinister division - and that’s heartening to know about and be present to. There is nothing so bonding and inspiring as a common cause to suddenly unite people out of necessity. Our government has grossly underestimated us and how deeply and quickly these bonds reach out to people under existential threat, it makes for very strange bed-fellows and brings together the best traits of folks who really do care about our traditional freedoms and our ancestors who won them for us. Ordinarily we would naturally be satellite groups without much knowledge of each other’s existence. But now we’re coming together in protests, in social media, in writing, in friendship circles, or just in conversations with others on a subject we feel deeply connected to for moral or even sheerly instinctual reasons. Does any politician understand these connective bonds? I doubt it. The people doing this to us have very few friends around them because politicians don’t make for great friends - they’re in it for public power and promotion - trust is a rare commodity and the fact that currently our leaders show us that they think they’re presiding over such a low-trust, stupid society that we must be micromanaged, controlled and divided at all costs says they actually don’t understand real trust-bonds between ordinary Kiwis and whanau. They are the abnormal ones in this regard. We’re neighbours, friends, colleagues, relations, social groups, casual contacts, exes, estranged step-children, estranged old friends… the more we’re pressured to form contacts around something we value so profoundly - the liberty of our way of life - the more the chasm between us shrinks to become just a small, thin crack in the concrete to be easily ignored. Take this opportunity to be honest about where you stand at this historical crossroads and don’t be the coward who rationalises their evil words and discriminatory behaviour by “just following orders.” That’s what fascism does, it counts on a bunch of unthinking, amoral robots without souls to do its dirty work. Our forefathers traveled thousands of miles from their homeland to smash fascism clean off the planet and we cannot break faith with them by allowing it to swallow up our nation here at home. Remember, our political leaders are put there temporarily by us to be our public servants and not our masters. They are there for no other reason than to protect our rights, liberties and way of life. They literally live on our dime. Let us keep reminding them of that fact and never let them forget it. Speak, write, learn, engage and come together in whatever capacity you can. We’re one nation under God and one people. This land is ours! Men of every creed and race Gather here before Thy face Asking Thee to bless this place God defend our free land From dissension, envy, hate And corruption guard our state Make our country good and great God defend New Zealand
5 Comments
By Olivia Pierson
Fellow New Zealanders, You have only three days left to make a submission to the Health Committee Covid-19 Public Health Response Amendment Bill, which curtails our freedoms even more in this new Age of Health Dictatorship. Here is the process if you wish to make your own. I’m publishing mine in order to encourage others to get off their chuffs and act. Here’s the actual Bill. ------------- Submission of Olivia Pierson COVID-19 Public Health Response Amendment Bill (No 2) My/our comments I'm a third generation NZ citizen watching this titanic advance of dictatorial powers ruin our entire civilisation over a human-engineered virus unleashed upon us, and the whole world, by our largest trading partner, China. Rather than smashing the NZ economy and stripping Kiwis of their most basic freedoms enshrined in our Bill of Rights, our government leaders need to condemn with one strong voice the Chinese Communist Party, their outright deceit in lockstep with the W.H.O over what transpired at the BSL-4 lab in Wuhan, and make serious attempts to decouple our economy from China's tainted, manipulative and now malign economic engine. I understand this to be a very hard road which the CCP will punish us for, as they have done to Australia and Australian businesses, but it needs to be done in the name of civilised principles, i.e: value for value trade with a trustworthy partner, sound human rights mutually respected, goodwill toward each other's wellbeing, good faith through transparency. China, under the CCP, is now clearly aberrant regarding these principles and no longer worthy of our trust. What they have done, in effect, is an act of bioterrorism. Even if initially an 'accidental leak,' the CCP's denial of human-to-human transmission and subsequent, continued flights from China, including from the province of Wuhan, into Europe, India, Australia, Africa, the U.S and New Zealand AFTER they knew that human-to-human transmission was a fact back in November of 2019, shows their intentions were far from innocent. While implementing a total domestic lockdown by February 2020, China assured the world that the situation was not serious and fully under control. It was not. My/our recommendations The Pfizer/BioNtech/Comirnaty vaccines are undeniably experimental - novel and gene-based mRNA therapies which provide very short-lived antibodies to only the Spike protein, which they are coded to mount an immune response against. They do not stop infection or transmission. They are also not a "safe and effective" vaccine - and the many many horrible and serious adverse reactions which have become a daily feature all over media and social media are testament to that (including our PM's Facebook page). Our Bill of Rights states clearly in Section 11: "Everyone has the right to refuse medical treatment." This important human right is backed by the monumental weight of the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki, both of which NZ is a signatory of. Your proposing of Section 11 in this Bill states: -(viii) report for and undergo a medical examination or testing of any kind, and at any place or time, specified and in any specified way or specified circumstances: This is an absolute affront and abuse of our natural rights as free citizens, in fact it is a crime against humanity and will be remembered by many as such. A vaccine is a medical treatment and in the case of these mRNA vaccines, they're being forced upon us and our children & grandchildren through propaganda, pressure and coercive manipulation without 3,5 & 7 year clinical data analyses, which usual scientific rigour requires of any new drug or vaccine before they are given to humans through the pharmaceutical markets. Also an affront to our precious natural rights are the Bill's new laws limiting, curtailing and harshly restricting our freedom of movement to halt the spread of a virus which is undoubtedly infectious, but does not kill 99.7% of people who contract it. Good prophylactics and early treatments are the best options for Covid-19, unless one is highly vulnerable through age, being immunocompromised or morbidly obese. Why did you restrict Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine? Where are our monoclonal antibody treatments, which are freely provided for all over the United States? Your only push 24/7 are lockdowns and the vaxx, the vaxx, the vaxx ad nauseam! You, our government, are manipulating an overblown, propagandized "health emergency" in order to take upon yourselves dictatorial powers previously unseen in this country. If you really believe that Covid-19 is such a terrible, omnipotent and killer threat to all of us, including our children, that the Declaration of Helsinki, the Nuremberg Code and our Bill of Rights must now be so egregiously over-ridden, where the hell is your loud, unequivocal condemnation of the CCP and the biological agent that they deployed? Why do you keep genuflecting to a trading partner this malevolent? Stop coercing people into an experimental medical treatment. Stop throttling our economy. Stop dividing citizens and pitting them against each other over lockdowns vs vaccines: a false dichotomy. Stop forcing our country into an economic crash from which we will not see a recovery anytime soon. Stop lying that the vaccines carry no serious harm. Stop brutally sweeping aside our natural liberties as if they are yours to grant to us if we do what you want. Stop pretending that China, under the CCP, is not a malign power. Stop turning New Zealand into a chronically low-trust society which needs such meddlesome micromanagement. Stop the disgusting propaganda so you can pull off a techno-communist-green Great Reset. Stop persecuting our farmers and food growers when we need them most for our own supply chains. Stop the outright tyranny. Open letter to Jacinda re: Methodological flaw in Covid data collection, by Dr. Guy Hatchard4/10/2021 
Dr. Guy Hatchard
Originally published by GaryMoller.com My friend, Dr Guy Hatchard, sent me this, an open letter he penned to our Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern, about the flawed way data is gathered and categorised on COVID deaths vs mRNA deaths. In his letter, Guy diplomatically outlines his concerns. To be honest, if it was me writing about this matter, there would be little in the way of diplomacy. I have no hesitation in calling for the immediate resignations of all the experts involved in what is increasingly looking like being one very huge and expensive disaster. ---------------------------- Open Letter To: Rt. Hon. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern Varying Methodologies to Assess Relative Risks have Distorted the Covid Debate, Tended to Misinform the Public, and Opened the Door to Mistakes in Public Health Policy. Dear Jacinda I want to thank you for the great compassion and clarity you have exhibited during your tenure as Prime Minister. Your promotion of science and scientists in alliance with government has been inspiring. Your capacity to communicate ideas is of the highest order. Your patience is exemplary. I am a scientist who has worked with statistical analysis of social data including time series analysis and panel regression analysis. I have also worked in the genetic testing industry. I am therefore well aware that to draw useful conclusions methodologies and data collection criteria have to be at foundation consistent. Given my data background and my long term concern for health, over the last few months I have corresponded with a number of scientists among your extensive advisory team. I have been able to express my views to them and ask questions. This is a great feature of your inclusive government approach. I understand very clearly that you have been risk averse, and for good reasons. Your aim is to protect public health and especially that of the vulnerable. I clearly understand that Covid poses a unique challenge to immediate and long term health. I also realise that our emergency health facilities here in New Zealand will be inadequate to provide services should Covid become widespread in the community. I support all efforts to prevent this happening including effective vaccination. Recently I have become puzzled by persistent personal reports of vaccine harm circulating in the public domain that are not reflected in the government reports of adverse reactions to the vaccine. I have reflected upon this, and communicated with friends and scientists here and overseas. As a result I am beginning to get a clear picture of a distinct divergence of methodologies which is distorting the presentation of information. Firstly, overseas there has been a general tendency in countries where there is an adequate reporting system in place, to certify deaths within one month of being actively ill with Covid, as being due solely to Covid. This has occurred even though it is clear that comorbidities are determinants of the risk of developing serious Covid. These comorbidities include (in no particular order) uncontrolled hypertension, obesity, diabetes, weakened immune system, certain medications (of which there are many), excessive fatigue, shift work, heart conditions, liver and kidney conditions, asthma, smoking, gender, ethnicity, advanced age, poverty and crowded living conditions, cancer, cystic fibrosis, sickle cell anaemia, pregnancy, dementia, and substance abuse. The policy of recording Covid on the death certificate irrespective of the comorbidities can be consistently applied and has its own logic. However the method of recording adverse effects of Covid vaccines is applied distinctly differently and in an opposite way. When a vaccine adverse effect is reported, the policy is to search for possible confounding morbidities, if one can be found then it is judged that the vaccine is not responsible. It is also not a policy to examine all deaths and adverse events for a whole month after vaccination, thus in addition many possible adverse effects are being omitted. It is well known that vaccines including Covid vaccines are vectors (or triggers) which can and do exacerbate a large number of comorbidities. Thus, taking a specific example, Covid vaccines are known to be associated with thrombosis, but this association is dismissed as causative because it predominantly occurs among people who already are known to be at risk of stroke. For example, a small number of people taking the contraceptive pill are known to be at risk of thrombosis. Should such a person die after receiving the vaccination as happened recently in New Zealand, the cause of death is ascribed to the contraceptive pill. This is an excessively conservative and misleading approach. Since the reporting methodologies of Covid severity and death versus vaccination adverse effects are divergent, conclusions drawn from these two sets of data are unsound. The distortion these two differing methodologies of reporting produce turns out to be significant in terms of public policy. Apples are being compared to oranges. Whilst Covid deaths appear inflated, vaccine adverse effects are greatly reduced to the extent that they appear to be virtually non-existent. This is not the case. As you are aware from your recent post on your Facebook page about vaccine side effects, which garnered 33,000 comments, vaccine side effects are highly unreported by the government agency but are not going unnoticed by a significant cohort of the public. What are the principal effects of this and other known facts on public policy? 1. Members of the public who have significant comorbidities likely to be triggered by the Covid vaccine are not being informed of the potential risks, quite the reverse. They are being encouraged and even pressured to take the vaccine with the impression that it is scientifically proven to be harmless. Thus they are being denied informed consent, and should they suffer adverse effects denied redress or acknowledgement. The imposition of vaccine mandates in certain professions confounds this further. The present discussion of possible vaccine passports will also do so. 2. The overriding importance of tackling comorbidities is masked—prior ill health is actually the main cause of death from Covid. Thus government policy is not doing enough to favour healthy diets and lifestyles. It could be doing more than it is, such as abolishing GST on fresh fruit and vegetables, imposing a sugar tax, introducing closer assessment, information, and control of additives, ultra processed foods, and known harmful pesticides, as well as maintaining clean air (including reducing off gassing in building materials and household goods). In this regard a huge opportunity is going missing. Approximately 75% of people recover from Covid without suffering serious illness or long term effects. Where is the funding for research to be done to determine what it is about their lifestyle, diet, environment, etc., which is supporting their health? 3. The vaccination of minors is a scandalous side effect of this misinformation. Research is yet incomplete, but an initial indication from the USA is that the Covid vaccine is four times more dangerous for males under 18 than Covid itself. Moreover, other research shows that the natural immune protection developed after recovery from Covid is 13 times more powerful than the temporary protection offered by the vaccine. Since the vaccine does not stem transmission of Covid, the purpose of vaccinating 12-17 year olds (not to speak of 5-12 year olds) is obscure and risky. It flies in the face of your caring stance. 4. It is not being publicised that the vaccine has been approved on an emergency basis. Its long term effects, which would normally be assessed before general use, have yet to be researched. Thus youth in particular and the whole population in general are exposed to some unquantified risks. How did it come about that you have been advised that the policies being followed are soundly based on science, whereas there is a fundamental methodological flaw being applied? The answer lies in historical policies which in their day might have been useful or expedient, and in the fragmentation, inconsistency in thinking, and lack of alertness among the busy scientific and health professionals formulating advice. Also in a certain willingness to accept at face value the consistency of data and conclusions sourced from different bodies, countries, and commercial interests. Vaccine developers and manufacturers are commercial bodies. At the heart of their endeavour is not just a desire to benefit health but also a push to secure profits in a highly competitive market. Over 117 vaccines have or are being developed worldwide. The failure to address statistically and publicly the interactions of vaccines with comorbidities is not just a matter of history but also a matter of marketing. Despite the fact that vaccine companies have been granted immunity from prosecution, they are still sensitive to public acceptance. Covid is a new disease that emerged rapidly and spread globally. Whilst Covid is very obviously greatly affected by comorbidities, vaccine side effect assessments have continued to follow protocols established for illnesses where comorbidities were of less importance. This needs to be urgently corrected. I trust that you will continue to take account of the science and be bold in adjusting your message accordingly. At present an erroneous impression might have been created that vaccinated individuals can be allowed free movement without downside, whilst the vaccine hesitant are blameworthy. On a positive note, it appears that new treatments for Covid are emerging (as indeed they did for AIDS). These are promising to lessen the impact and mortality rate of the disease. If these gather pace, your policy of elimination will be vindicated. In this light, extension of elimination strategies may prove within a short time frame to result in a long term benefit. As you know, vaccination alone is proving insufficient to control the disease around the world, even in developed countries. Therefore it is unlikely to do so here. New treatments may hold one answer. No doubt your government is closely monitoring these and proposing to adopt them. If there is one clear lesson of the pandemic it is this:—maintenance of personal health through access to diet, exercise, cleanliness, and adequate rest is still the most vital determinant of public health and should be the priority of government health policy. With best wishes Guy Hatchard PhD ------------------------------- Some additional information showing how statistics are being manipulated to mislead the public: The CDC defines breakthrough cases as the following: For the purpose of this surveillance, a vaccine breakthrough infection is defined as the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen in a respiratory specimen collected from a person ≥14 days after they have completed all recommended doses of a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-authorized COVID-19 vaccine. It is vital for everyone to understand the ramifications of this as it pertains to reporting deaths of the vaccinated vs unvaccinated. If I take one dose of the Pfizer/Moderna jab and die, I’m considered an unvaccinated death. If I take two doses of the Pfizer/Moderna jab and die within the two week period that follows, I’m still considered an unvaccinated death. As soon as booster becomes “recommended,” this can render (by their own definition) all people who are currently considered to be fully vaccinated as unvaccinated again. It’s beyond absurd to think that someone could put a foreign substance into their body, die immediately, and then be told the reason for death was because they didn’t put that second (or third, etc.) dose of the same foreign substance into their body soon enough. That isn’t science. It’s clear manipulation of statistics. It should also be mentioned that there is a clear discrepancy between PCR testing of the vaccinated (CT less than 28) and unvaccinated (CT free-for-all, 35 to 45 range is common. The combination of all of this:
Fully vaccinated people will be under-reported in COVID death statistics, while partially vaccinated and unvaccinated will both erroneously inflate COVID death statistics. |
Post Archives
October 2021
Links to Other Blogs |
RSS Feed