By Olivia Pierson
[First published on Insight @the BFD 29/8/19]

After watching the extraordinary G7 Summit coverage and press conferences; President Trump, leading directly from the front – in contrast to his predecessor President Obama who liked to lead from behind – lends validity to the title “leader of the free world.”

This summit was all about world trade, specifically the readjustment of it, and Trump commandeered the whole event with the prowess and ease of a great businessman turned statesman.
 
Though there are still the nuts and bolts of wording and terms yet to be agreed upon, Japan and the United States struck an important deal “in principle” at the summit. Japan has agreed to buy surplus corn from America’s farmers and cut the 38.5 percent tariffs on American beef to 9 percent. 

The United States expects Japan to join a coalition to protect ships in the Strait of Hormuz.  Yasutoshi Nishimura, Japan’s Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary, said that there were “no discussions specifically on Iran” between Trump and Abe at the summit, but previous negotiations with the United States have already been made clear on this issue.

President Trump, in a sympathetic remark about Britain’s former PM, Theresa May, reiterated just how tough and difficult the European Union were to negotiate with: “Just ask Theresa May”, he said during his press conference. 
Germany is a nation that is export-dependent, especially when it comes to their car market. With her country facing economic recession, Angela Merkel told the press that Germany wants the EU to reach a trade deal with the US as quickly as possible: 

“We want to talk now about the EU and the United States having deeper talks as quickly as possible,” Merkel told reporters, “We have a great interest in our trade being intensified. I think we can find solutions, Germany, within the framework of the EU, is working hard on this.”

President Trump, whilst hailing Boris Johnson as the right man to lead Brexit and saying that he’s “been waiting for about six years for him to become Prime Minister”, has promised the United Kingdom a speedy free-trade deal if, as planned, they leave the EU later this year. 

A notable highlight of the summit was President Trump and US Treasury Secretary, Steve Mnuchin, announcing that China had made contact on Sunday night saying that they were interested in conducting trade talks after the latest round of brutal trade-war tariff escalations. Remembering that the Chinese have a huge cultural stake in “saving face” and also that they are under the world microscope with chronic tensions and riots unfolding presently in Hong Kong, the Chinese are not admitting to much publicly about these said contacts being made to the US, but Vice Premier Liu stated on Monday at the Smart China Expo in Chongqing:

“We are willing to solve the problem through consultation and cooperation with a calm attitude. We firmly oppose the escalation of the trade war… it is not conducive to China, the U.S. and the interests of people all over the world.”

President Trump responded to that statement:  

“They want to make a deal very badly… the tariffs have hit them very hard. He wants to see a deal made, he wants it to be made under calm conditions. He used the word ‘calm,’ I agree with him.”

This is movement in the right direction, but nobody expects trade talks with China to be solved immediately; after all, the status quo has been the result of decades of appeasement.  What is clear is that Trump has now managed to get the other G7 countries to sing from the same song-sheet that he has been singing solo from since he decided to make his bid for the presidency. 

President Macron of France performed a peculiar attempted ambush on President Trump, when he invited the Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif, to attend the summit with the intention of getting Zarif and Trump to the negotiating table, amidst rising tensions between their two countries due to crippling sanctions and the withdrawal of the U.S from the JCPOA deal in 2017.

President Trump refused to meet with Zarif; but he said he’d be open to talks in the near future, should the Iranian regime be so inclined – which obviously they are, despite their fanatical bravado and rhetoric to date.  

This was an excellent move on Trump’s part and a very shady one on Macron’s, however, Trump stated that he didn’t mind Macron’s actions in the least, as Macron had sought his approval with a phone call to apprise him of the situation beforehand.  Macron, slightly petulantly, counteracted that statement by saying that he had “informed” the president of the rogue invitation. An odd business indeed.  What it does make clear is how much the EU needs the US to move ahead on all matters pertaining to Iran.  Trump handled this curve-ball beautifully, showing just how diplomatically clever his instincts are.  The ambush was quashed, and Iran has now revealed just how desperate they are to alter the dire (for them) status quo. All the G7 nations remain unanimous that Iran must not get a nuclear weapon. 

President Trump floated the idea that Putin be brought back to the annual summit, considering that so many of the talks involve Russia when Putin is never in the room to answer any of the important geopolitical questions.  This is particularly strange considering how much gas and oil Europe continues to purchase from Russia; with a much higher consumption rate on the cards with the new Nord Stream 2 pipeline, which bypasses Ukraine.  Spearheaded by President Obama, Russia’s membership was suspended from G8 after Putin’s 2014 aggressive annexation of Crimea.  President Trump has come under harsh criticism by the American media for making the point at this summit that “Putin outsmarted Obama.”

This is actually an incredible understatement on President Trump’s part. 
 
During the 2008 American election, Sarah Palin, who was then on the Republican ticket as John McCain’s running mate, stated that “Putin’s intention might be to invade Ukraine.”  She was widely derided as an ignoramus and mocked for it while being laughed out of every single newsroom. Then later in 2012, during the election debates, Republican candidate, Mitt Romney, stated that President Obama was “naive when it came to Russia’s intentions” as a recovering world power and that they remained a “powerful geo-political foe.”   Obama laughed out loud, and told Romney that “the Cold War was over.”

So Obama was not just outsmarted by Putin, he was bent over a barrel and reamed by him. Then Putin found himself disinvited from further world summits.  Good on President Trump for reminding the folks who may have forgotten all this; especially now, when many of them may be wishing for a more naive, softer touch from an American president at the same time that the EU furthers its agenda for an even higher energy dependence on Russia while simultaneously they prefer Putin not to be in the room as world trade talks take place.

The fake news media are reporting that “President Trump demands that Putin be reinstated at world summits.”  He did no such thing.  He pointed out the facts of where the issues lie in the real world, in real time.

The main take-aways from this summit were a powerful America attracting new trade deals with Europe and the UK, a great trade deal with Japan later this year, unanimity concerning Iran’s not being able to acquire a nuclear weapon, unanimity that China has acted against WTO rules (and that it is unacceptable), potential talks between the US and Iran and the likelihood of new negotiations on the horizon to be furthered between China and the US.

But don’t look to the MSM to be anything other than a hundred percent negative about the entire event – we’re used to this bad faith reporting from them.  All they are hoping for is a world recession and an American economic collapse in order for the Democratic party to be able to run its 2020 election campaign message on “Trump brought about a recession and ruined trade.” 
​
Nothing could be further from the truth.  Next, they’ll be calling the president Hitler, Stalin and Mao combined; oh wait…

If you enjoyed this article, please buy my book "Western Values Defended: A Primer"

By Olivia Pierson
[First published on Insight @ The BFD 22/8/19]

If ever there was a man who could be deemed worthy of remembrance for his radical commitments to the cause of human freedom, Thomas Paine would be that man.

Born to a Quaker family of Thetford, England, in 1737, Paine played a crucial part in the American Revolution of 1776 and the French Revolution of 1789, after his popular pamphlets Common Sense and The American Crisis swept through the Western worlds, both new and old, placing before the public eye in simple, yet dramatic terms, the virtues of self-government and individual liberty.

He despised tyranny and oppression, the divine right of kings, organised religion, the death penalty and slavery.  He loved reason, freedom, the emancipation of mankind and was the first person to coin the term “the United States of America” and to use the term “democracy” as something other than a pejorative.

Paine thought the revolution in America did not go far enough since it did not abolish black slavery and he thought the revolution in France went too far since it became entrenched in medieval violence and bloodshed. He took bold private stands in both revolutions against his own friends, colleagues and comrades, never willing to compromise his conscience, but always ready to go it alone if that’s where the courage of his convictions took him – and it nearly always did. 

Paine had been introduced to Benjamin Franklin in London, who wrote him a letter of recommendation precipitating Paine’s immigration to Philadelphia in 1774, whereupon he found employment editing a new publication, the Pennsylvania Magazine.  Under an array of pseudonyms, Paine began to write articles attacking slavery as well as abuses enacted by the British monarchy upon the colonies of America.

The American Revolution
As Americans began to think and only whisper about throwing off the British yoke after the battles of Lexington and Concord, in 1776 Paine roared it from the proverbial rooftops when he anonymously penned Common Sense, seriously laying out the case for the independence of the thirteen American colonies and a complete break with England.  This powerfully treasonous pamphlet caused an overnight sensation as it was read aloud in ale-houses, public squares, churches and meeting-houses up-and-down the East Coast:

“Even the distance at which the Almighty hath placed England and America, is a strong and natural proof, that the authority of the one, over the other, was never the design of Heaven. The time likewise at which the continent was discovered, adds weight to the argument, and the manner in which it was peopled increases the force of it. The reformation was preceded by the discovery of America, as if the Almighty graciously meant to open a sanctuary to the persecuted in future years, when home should afford neither friendship nor safety.” 

THOMAS PAINE, COMMON SENSE, 1776

Paine’s timely but scorching plain-speak inspired the revolutionary mind of Thomas Jefferson and other Founding Fathers of the Continental Congress to write the Declaration of Independence and send it to the parliament of King George III.  War with England became inevitable. 

By the end of ’76, Paine found himself aide-de-camp to George Washington’s top military commander, General Nathanael Greene.  America’s citizen militias were being thoroughly routed by superbly trained British armies.  Morale bottomed-out and Americans were deserting the Continental army in droves. Paine, wanting to cement their fighting spirit, penned the American Crisis and Washington had it read aloud to all of his troops on Christmas Day.  It opened with these words:

“These are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.” 

THOMAS PAINE, THE AMERICAN CRISIS, 1776

After the War of Independence was resoundingly won, President Washington once remarked, “Americans owe their liberty to Thomas Paine, more than any other man.”

But years later, when Paine desperately needed his friends in America to come to his aid while he suffered on death row in a French prison (Luxembourg), only one saw fit to really help him.

The French Revolution
1789 saw the outbreak of the Revolution in France, which Paine, who was once again back in England building a prototype for a bridge, supported wholeheartedly in principle.  In order to refute Edmond Burke’s sulphurous and counterrevolutionary diatribe, Reflections on the Revolution in France, in 1791 Paine penned the great document, The Rights of Man, forever linking the cause of mankind with the cause of natural rights.  Revolutionary France lapped it up gratefully, but the work’s anti-monarchy sentiments made him an outlaw in England.  Paine bolted to Calais for his life.

The French made him an honorary citizen and Paine was elected to the French National Assembly, where its highest committee was to decide on the fate of King Louis XVI and his queen, Marie Antoinette.  Through a french interpreter, Paine made an impassioned speech to spare their lives, and though he supported the new French Republic, he advocated for both monarchs to be exiled to the United States, rather than be executed, not only on the basis that Paine felt a natural abhorrence for the death penalty but also because King Louis had come to America’s defence by sending troops to help fight its war of independence against Britain:

 “It is to France alone, I know, that the United States of America owe that support which enabled them to shake off an unjust and tyrannical yoke. The ardor and zeal which she displayed to provide both men and money were the natural consequences of a thirst for liberty. But as the nation at that time, restrained by the shackles of her own Government, could only act by means of a monarchical organ, this organ, whatever in other respects the object might be, certainly performed a good, a great action.” 

THOMAS PAINE, SPEECH TO THE FRENCH ASSEMBLY, 1792

His defence of the king and queen marked Paine out as an enemy of the Montagnards, the revolutionary group in power who instigated the Reign of Terror, led by Jean-Paul Marat and Maximilien Robespierre.  

By the end of ’93, Paine was arrested and imprisoned without trial for being an enemy British citizen.

During his ten months in prison, where rogue fevers, typhus and a weeping open wound on his stomach severely and permanently damaged his health, where every day he expected to lose his head as those all around him were losing theirs (sometimes over a hundred heads in one night), Paine became deeply embittered with thoughts that President George Washington et al had betrayed him by not securing his release on the basis that he was an American citizen; he was one of America’s most famously celebrated revolutionaries.

But this is also where he managed to write a draft of his famous work on Deism, The Age of Reason. Aside from railing against the wedlock of church and state, it was Paine’s attempt to rescue a benevolent, yet non-interventionist, God from religion – a religion which he saw as violent, spurious and corrupt.  Intended for a French audience, but dedicated to his fellow “Citizens of the United States of America,” he opened Part One of the book with these words: 

“I believe in one God, and no more; and I hope for happiness beyond this life.

I believe in the equality of man; and I believe that religious duties consist in doing justice, loving mercy, and endeavouring to make our fellow-creatures happy.

But, lest it should be supposed that I believe many other things in addition to these, I shall, in the progress of this work, declare the things I do not believe, and my reasons for not believing them.

I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish Church, by the Roman Church, by the Greek Church, by the Turkish Church, by the Protestant Church, nor by any church that I know of. 

My own mind is my own church.

All national institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit.

I do not mean by this declaration to condemn those who believe otherwise; they have the same right to their belief as I have to mine. But it is necessary to the happiness of man that he be mentally faithful to himself. Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe.” 

THOMAS PAINE, THE AGE OF REASON, 1794

The Age of Reason became one of the most controversial books of its time, and for subsequent decades hastened many a publisher and bookseller into the bonds of prison-time for trucking in outright blasphemy. On a personal note for Paine, the book served to sever almost all of his friendships in the United States.  He was regarded as a “profligate atheist.”

By dint of a freak mistake, the executioners failed to see the ominous chalk-mark scrawled on Paine’s prison door when they came to take the next batch of men and women to the guillotine – and so he was spared that night. (Paine thought it was because of his deathly fever that he couldn’t be moved.)  Three days later, Robespierre was executed by guillotine and the Reign of Terror came to an end.  It was future American president, James Monroe, then Ambassador to France, who finally came through for Paine by securing his release from prison. Monroe made Paine a guest in his Parisian home while he convalesced, and it was there that Paine finished The Age of Reason. 

Still galled by the pangs of perceived betrayal by his American fellow-revolutionaries, from Paris Paine embarked on a scathing public letter to his former friend and hero, President George Washington.  The letter caused an uproar in America, as the Federalists and Democratic Republicans battled out their differences:
 
“The part I acted in the American Revolution is well known; I shall not here repeat it. I know also that had it not been for the aid received from France, in men, money and ships, that your cold and unmilitary conduct (as I shall show in the course of this letter) would in all probability have lost America; at least she would not have been the independent nation she now is. You slept away your time in the field, till the finances of the country were completely exhausted, and you have but little share in the glory of the final event. It is time, Sir, to speak the undisguised language of historical truth.” 

THOMAS PAINE TO GEORGE WASHINGTON, 1796

In this same letter, Paine also takes pains to vehemently fulminate against the character of future president, John Adams: 

“John Adams has said (and John it is known was always a speller after places and offices, and never thought his little services were highly enough paid) John has said, that as Mr. Washington had no child, the Presidency should be made hereditary in the family of Lund Washington. John might then have counted upon some sinecure himself, and a provision for his descendants…John Adams is one of those men who never contemplated the origin of government, or comprehended anything of first principles. If he had, he might have seen that the right to set up and establish hereditary government never did, and never can, exist in any generation at any time whatever; that it is of the nature of treason; because it is an attempt to take away the rights of all the minors living at that time, and of all succeeding generations.” 

THOMAS PAINE TO GEORGE WASHINGTON, 1796

When Thomas Jefferson won the U.S presidency over John Adams’ second term in 1801, Jefferson officially invited Paine to return home to America, which Paine did immediately. Although Jefferson had been warned by everybody not to associate with Paine, that “atheistic drunk” with the twisted mind, Jefferson walked with him arm-in-arm about the public square as an open and public show of their friendship. 

Despite the heavy censorship of Paine’s work The Age of Reason, millions of people on both sides of the Atlantic read the humane and Deistic reasoning of its texts, and the late 18th Century epoch itself began to be referred to as “the Age of Reason.”  John Adams vociferated bitterly and sarcastically about this swing of grand fate, but even he came to admit that:

“I know not whether any man in the world has had more influence on its inhabitants or affairs for the last thirty years than Tom Paine […] Call it then ‘the Age of Paine.’” 

JOHN ADAMS TO BENJAMIN WATERHOUSE, 1805 

On a tragically pathetic note, toward the end of his life, Paine, who was then scarred by poverty, loneliness and chronically broken health (and probably alcoholism), went to vote in a local election but was turned away and scolded that he was “not an American citizen,” so dishevelled and raw was his appearance to his fellow man. 
 
Paine died on the 8th June 1809.  Six people came to his funeral, two of whom were black freedmen.  The Quakers refused his last will and testament to be buried in their graveyard, so he was buried on his own land in New Rochelle, which the Continental Congress had gifted him straight after the Revolutionary War when they once felt that they were in his eternal debt. 
 
Over a century later, the 19th Century American writer and orator, Robert G Ingersoll, who lived in a time which, because of its intellectual freedom, he thought he owed to the thinking of Paine, wrote these words about him:

We must also remember that there is a difference between independence and liberty. Millions have fought for independence — to throw off some foreign yoke — and yet were at heart the enemies of true liberty. A man in jail, sighing to be free, may be said to be in favour of liberty, but not from principle; but a man who, being free, risks or gives his life to free the enslaved, is a true soldier of liberty.

Thomas Paine had passed the legendary limit of life. One by one most of his old friends and acquaintances had deserted him. Maligned on every side, execrated, shunned and abhorred — his virtues denounced as vices — his services forgotten — his character blackened, he preserved the poise and balance of his soul. He was a victim of the people, but his convictions remained unshaken. He was still a soldier in the army of freedom, and still tried to enlighten and civilize those who were impatiently waiting for his death. Even those who loved their enemies hated him, their friend — the friend of the whole world — with all their hearts.

On the 8th of June, 1809, death came — Death, almost his only friend.

At his funeral no pomp, no pageantry, no civic procession, no military display. In a carriage, a woman and her son who had lived on the bounty of the dead — on horseback, a Quaker, the humanity of whose heart dominated the creed of his head — and, following on foot, two negroes, filled with gratitude — constituted the funeral cortege of Thomas Paine.

He who had received the gratitude of many millions, the thanks of generals and statesmen — he who had been the friend and companion of the wisest and best — he who had taught a people to be free, and whose words had inspired armies and enlightened nations, was thus given back to Nature, the mother of us all. 
​
ROBERT G INGERSOLL, THOMAS PAINE, 1870

And on that salutary note, ladies and gentleman, I leave you to ponder the unusual life of Thomas Paine, a tragic hero if ever there was one; writer, revolutionary, philanthropist and advocate for free thought and human liberty.


If you enjoyed this article, please buy my book "Western Values Defended: A Primer"
​

​

By Olivia Pierson
[First published on INSIGHT at the BFD 6/8/19]
​

The El Paso shooter, 21-year-old Patrick Crusius, who went on a murder spree at a local Walmart over the weekend, leaving 20 people dead and many more horribly injured, is being described by media as an anti-immigrant, white supremacist. But his supposed manifesto speaks to a crime committed in order to help save the planet and the environment.  Another ecofascist strikes.
 
Brenton Tarrant, the Christchurch mass-killer, said of himself:

“I am an Ethno-nationalist Eco-fascist.”

What is an ecofascist again?  A person who believes fanatically that over-population is ruining the health of our planet’s environment, hastened by a culture of chronic, corporate-fuelled, greedy consumerism.  They think (some) humans need to be culled.

Crusius’ manifesto contained these words: 

“The American lifestyle affords our citizens an incredible quality of life. However, our lifestyle is destroying the environment of our country. The decimation of the environment is creating a massive burden for future generations… Fresh water is being polluted from farming and oil drilling operations. Consumer culture is creating thousands of tons of unnecessary plastic waste and electronic waste, and recycling to help slow this down is almost non-existent.”  

Far from being motivated by just anti-immigrant white supremacism, which the MSM are spinning hard in order to blame the shooter’s inspiration on President Trump’s so-called “racist rhetoric,” Crusius seems to have acted to help make America cleaner, greener and more sustainable, in his dastardly way. 

The manifesto continues:

“Corporations that also like immigration because more people means a bigger market for their products. I just want to say that I love the people of this country, but god damn most of y’all are just too stubborn to change your lifestyle. So the next logical step is to decrease the number of people in America using resources. If we can get rid of enough people, then our way of life can become more sustainable.”

Crusius took aim with a gun and randomly mowed down innocent people without any regard to their ethnicity, for not only Mexicans and Latinos died that day.  What his victims did have in common was that they were all out shopping, i.e, consuming at a big, corporate Walmart store.

It has long been a well-documented complaint of environmentalists that the world is becoming over-populated to the detriment of the planet because of the need to keep exploiting the earth’s resources while spoiling our oceans, rivers, streams – and the very climate itself.

Are men such as Crusius and Tarrant anti-immigrant racists?  Yes, I’m sure they are.  But they have also become infected with another form of extremism that very few people want to talk about, and that is environmentalist extremism: anti-capitalist, anti-industrial, anti-consumerist and anti-corporate.

This ‘green extremism’ has its historical genesis in the Nazi Party of the 1930s.
 
The Green Tyranny: Exposing the Totalitarian Roots of the Climate Industrial Complex, a book by author Rupert Darwall, explains how the modern environmentalist movement was pre-figured in the Third Reich: 
 
“If you look at what the Nazis were doing in the 1930s, in their environmental policies, virtually every theme you see in the modern environmental movement, the Nazis were doing. It happens to be historical fact that the Nazis were the first political party in the world to have a wind power program. It also happens to be a fact that they were against meat eating, and they considered…it…terribly wasteful that so much grain went to feed livestock rather than to make bread. It’s also the case that they had the equivalent of fuel economy rules because they had the most expensive gasoline in Europe and so they basically had very few people driving cars […] I think actually the most extraordinary thing that I came across was this quote from Adolf Hitler where he told an aide once, ‘I’m not interested in politics. I’m interested in changing people’s lifestyles.’ That’s extraordinarily contemporary. That is what the modern environmental movement is all about. It’s about changing people’s lifestyles.” 

If we are going to talk about what motivates mass shooters of the ecofascist variety, it is nothing short of propaganda to merely label these nutters as “white supremacists.” 
 
There happens to be a much deeper layer of their motivation to kill innocent folks which needs to be exposed. But this is troublesome because it also happens to be a layer that is widely forced down the public’s throat by both those on the Left and the Right through widespread, extremist narratives about environmentalism and climate alarmism. These narratives are consistently telling us we are currently living through a man-made climate emergency that we only have twelve odd years to address before a massive natural cataclysm occurs which will destroy civilisation.  They are narratives that do not tolerate debate, nor dissent, which makes them highly dubious for that very fact alone.

In the case of Crusius and Tarrant, it is as if these young men have swallowed every form of extremist thought dished out to them by the hand of their culture – and the doom and gloom prophesies of green environmentalism, universally peddled by politicians and media, are certainly part of that malevolent web woven tightly in their minds. 

If radical Leftists and Greenies want to bleat on-and-on about a neo-nazi ideology which may be embedded in the minds of some mass-shooters, they need to be made to explain the neo-nazi anti-capitalist, anti-industrial and anti-corporate ideology embedded deeply within their own radical environmentalist politics and policies.

If you enjoyed this article, please buy my book "Western Values Defended: A Primer"